• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Do you think you have free will?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    Given that we already know MP is capable of simultaneously raising a child, holding down a contract, dealing with an arse of an ex and fending off HMRC, I am perfectly willing to accept that she could add kicking my arse to that list without even blinking and that philosophy is something she doesnt bother with cos it presents no challenge
    Creep.



    Loves it. Ta!
    Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
    +5 Xeno Cool Points

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
      I’m struggling to describe my thoughts on this but I have a feeling ‘random’ doesn’t really exist, but actually something which is the result of entropy may appear random while still obeying certain rules.

      Sort of, erm, innit.
      I have trouble believing randomness can come from nowhere too. Randomness is usually a tricky thing to achieve and a high level phenomenon.

      I believe there exist deterministic (hidden variable) theories that are compatible with (the predictions of the randomness and undecidedness inherent in) quantum theory, but I'm not sure on current status. At one point they had appeared to have been killed off, but I'm not certain today.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
        Randomness is usually a tricky thing to achieve and a high level phenomenon.

        .
        Randomness is seen at a very low (sub-atomic) level.
        Hard Brexit now!
        #prayfornodeal

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by sasguru View Post
          Randomness is seen at a very low (sub-atomic) level.
          Is it really randomness or conformity to rules we do not yet understand?
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
            Where does randomness come from though?
            God playing dice, of course.
            Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
              Where does randomness come from though?
              Randomness is an illusion also.
              Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
              threadeds website, and here's my blog.

              Comment


                #27
                Free will exists.

                All you need to do is to come up with a suiltable thought experiment.


                You do not believe in free will.


                So here is my thought experiment.


                I have an advantage over you, because I can come around to your house, bone your missus, steal your money and eat your tea. There is no point trying to reason with me, my actions are predetermined. There is no point trying to punish me afterwards, i couldnt help myself. There is no point trying to deter others by punishing me, they too are predetermined.



                Now you try coming round to my house and doing that.
                I believe you had a choice so I will reach for the baseball bat.
                You can think it over whilst lying in the hospital bed drinking tomato soup through a straw.


                so in evolutionary terms, it pays to believe in free will, plus you get burgled less



                (\__/)
                (>'.'<)
                ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by sasguru View Post
                  Randomness is seen at a very low (sub-atomic) level.

                  appears to be seen

                  Hidden variable theories are possible.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
                    so in evolutionary terms, it pays to believe in free will, plus you get burgled less
                    Indeed.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
                      Free will exists.

                      All you need to do is to come up with a suiltable thought experiment.


                      You do not believe in free will.


                      So here is my thought experiment.


                      I have an advantage over you, because I can come around to your house, bone your missus, steal your money and eat your tea. There is no point trying to reason with me, my actions are predetermined. There is no point trying to punish me afterwards, i couldnt help myself. There is no point trying to deter others by punishing me, they too are predetermined.



                      Now you try coming round to my house and doing that.
                      I believe you had a choice so I will reach for the baseball bat.
                      You can think it over whilst lying in the hospital bed drinking tomato soup through a straw.


                      so in evolutionary terms, it pays to believe in free will, plus you get burgled less



                      Well, I agree that it pays to practice a belief in free will, but is that the same as really believing in it? In some societies it is beneficial to demonstrate a belief in God, Allah or some other deity, and in fact in some societies it’s dangerous not to demonstrate that belief. However, demonstrating belief and believing are not the same. You can pretend for your own gain or safety, while privately not believing.

                      I’ll still kick your head in if you try it with Lady Tester though.
                      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X