• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Do you think you have free will?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    You don't need many rules. With only a few simple conditional rules, adding perhaps 'take a right in afternoon' and 'take a left in the morning', 'take a left if there's a tree on the left, and a right if not', and 'do not turn into a road where there is a dogturd' and 'unless the last turn in that direction was crap', and several repetitions you would achieve a chaotic situation where the end result varies wildly according to tiny variations in the starting conditions.
    no, you are bringing judgement into the equation.

    forget judgement
    forget values
    forget a priori
    (\__/)
    (>'.'<)
    ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
      no, you are bringing judgement into the equation.

      forget judgement
      forget values
      forget a priori

      Comment


        #53
        Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
        forget the road.

        the road was a paradigm. a model. a structure.


        ok, you have a decision, a or b

        where a is the left road. etc

        and there is no a priori, nothing to base a judgement on

        no road
        no judgement


        determinism will always choose a, free will will sometimes pick b


        How could you tell true free will from a sufficiently complex determinism that sometimes chose b?

        I think their are two subtly related questions here.

        a) are the laws of physics deterministic (in the sense of hidden variable theories & low-level deterministic chaos .vs. quantum reality being truly truly non-deterministic)

        b) do deterministic physical laws imply a "less free" free will than we would have under non-deterministic physical laws?

        Now to my mind the answer to b is no, because a mind whose decisions are determined by truly non-deterministic processes over which it has no influence is no more "free" than a mind operating according to deterministic rules. Unpredictable, yes, but free, no.
        Last edited by doodab; 19 March 2010, 14:27.
        While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

        Comment


          #54
          Originally posted by doodab View Post
          How could you tell true free will from a sufficiently complex determinism that sometimes chose b?

          .
          easily.

          you take the mind bogglingly complex system that generates the illusion of free will and you remove one molecule

          you keep on doing that until you have a deterministic system that always chooses a.

          (\__/)
          (>'.'<)
          ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

          Comment


            #55
            Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
            easily.

            you take the mind bogglingly complex system that generates the illusion of free will and you remove one molecule

            you keep on doing that until you have a deterministic system that always chooses a.

            So basically you propose to suck your brain out through a straw in order to prove that you don't have free will?
            While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

            Comment


              #56
              Originally posted by doodab View Post
              So basically you propose to suck your brain out through a straw in order to prove that you don't have free will?
              In an alien came down in a flying saucer, and decided to zap London rather than New York, it might be because of free will, it might not.

              this is not a human question



              (\__/)
              (>'.'<)
              ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

              Comment


                #57
                Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
                In an alien came down in a flying saucer, and decided to zap London rather than New York, it might be because of free will, it might not.

                this is not a human question

                But is the decision due to free will if it's dependent on a non deterministic quantum process over which the alien has no control?

                Sure, you might not get the same outcome every time, but that doesn't make it an act of free will, any more than the quantum process itself is an act of free will.
                While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                Comment


                  #58
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  No, mine cost me more than a thousand euros. Bloody solicitors, they’re like contractors but more expensive.
                  Originally posted by doodab View Post
                  But is the decision due to free will if it's dependent on a non deterministic quantum process over which the alien has no control?

                  Sure, you might not get the same outcome every time, but that doesn't make it an act of free will, any more than the quantum process itself is an act of free will.
                  This all demonstrates that my original interpretation of the question makes it much easier to answer.
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    #59
                    all you are doing doodab, is heaping more ofuscation on the original premise

                    i would sit here for hours defining exactly what quantum mechanic has to be where to make a proper experiment.

                    the beauty of a thought experiment is that you can get round all that by saying


                    if everything remains the same or
                    all things being equal


                    so all things being equal
                    a determinist will choose a every time
                    a freewill will not

                    (\__/)
                    (>'.'<)
                    ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                    Comment


                      #60
                      I think EO’s brain has overheated. Either that or he’s had just had his tenth pint of the afternoon.
                      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X