• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Seeking asylum from Canada

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #81
    Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
    I wouldn't go that far. Of course I don't know if they were in treatment or not, surely they should have been if they were not.
    So you are now saying he was mad and there was no threat to him from Canada and agree with me he should have been put back there as soon as he arrived claiming this mince, thanks.

    Comment


      #82
      Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
      It's not the job of this country to take care of the mentally ill from other countries
      UK has got obligation to follow asylum laws that are pretty much universal. Historically UK was a safe harbour to those fleeing persecution - top applications actually come from countries that were meddled by UK to a substantial degree: Iraq, Afganistan.

      I've now read up more on this case and it seems there is a reason why they decided to leave Canada - they would not get citizenship there because it is apparently Canadian common practice not to give it to ex-KGB officers. If I was in this position I'd certainly move to another country - UK is perfect from this point of view.

      Comment


        #83
        Originally posted by minestrone View Post
        I have now decided to believe everything that asylum seekers say, I mean why would they tell anyone lies?

        And the system will run much better if we believe everything they say and assume they would not be a potential problem living in the UK. Let them all stay I say.
        Really bad idea, sends out the signal to the Worlds disaffected to flock here cos we'll let everyone stay.

        Spain tried an amnesty for illegals and regretted it, resulted in even more trying to get in...

        Comment


          #84
          Originally posted by AtW View Post
          I've now read up more on this case and it seems there is a reason why they decided to leave Canada - they would not get citizenship there because it is apparently Canadian common practice not to give it to ex-KGB officers. If I was in this position I'd certainly move to another country - UK is perfect from this point of view.
          So you are willing to believe what the press reports a suicidal paranoid told in is asylum application.

          Comment


            #85
            Originally posted by AtW View Post
            UK has got obligation to follow asylum laws that are pretty much universal. Historically UK was a safe harbour to those fleeing persecution - top applications actually come from countries that were meddled by UK to a substantial degree: Iraq, Afganistan.

            I've now read up more on this case and it seems there is a reason why they decided to leave Canada - they would not get citizenship there because it is apparently Canadian common practice not to give it to ex-KGB officers. If I was in this position I'd certainly move to another country - UK is perfect from this point of view.
            Think Somalia is top of the list, my bro is a Social Worker and he to deal with them and their machetes.

            Still doesn't explain how Somalis, Afghans and Iraqis can claim asylum in UK since they are obliged under the rules of political asylum to claim it in the first safe country the land in.

            Now as these citizens need a visa to land here by air, which they won't get, they must come by truck, and pass through God knows how many safe countries. So to me it's logical the UK should have very few asylum claims.

            Comment


              #86
              Originally posted by minestrone View Post
              So you are now saying he was mad and there was no threat to him from Canada and agree with me he should have been put back there as soon as he arrived claiming this mince, thanks.
              It appears the health systems in both countries failed these people. Considering the Canadian one is so tulipe that's not hard to believe. I would have thought the NHS would have caught on sooner.
              McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
              Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."

              Comment


                #87
                Originally posted by stek View Post
                Still doesn't explain how Somalis, Afghans and Iraqis can claim asylum in UK since they are obliged under the rules of political asylum to claim it in the first safe country the land in.
                Chances are that those guys actually worked for British forces there and would have no other chances to get the feck out of those countries.

                Whether UK is the first country they landed or not is secondary consideration - you should also consider that asylum applications can be made in embassies, you don't need to travel.

                Comment


                  #88
                  Originally posted by AtW View Post
                  Whether UK is the first country they landed or not is secondary consideration
                  Er, not it's not...
                  Older and ...well, just older!!

                  Comment


                    #89
                    Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
                    Er, not it's not...
                    It practical terms it is secondary if the country they came from is dangerous and/or they are actually fleeing real prosecution.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X