Originally posted by TimberWolf
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Anyone know.....
Collapse
X
-
You see, what you have said there is still not correct. What we should calculate is the rate x number of contractors/bench. That way we can see the value of the contracting market and how it has changed!What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions! -
Yup, sort out the bob situation and rates will look after themselves.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostThe message should be about the numbers being benched, not about taking rate cuts.
The PCG have got the wrong end of the horse here and showing extraordinary naivety.Comment
-
It doesn't matter how you spin it, even if you say £300/day is more like £40k/year, it's way more than the masses make in every-day jobs and the average Sun reader is going to think you're Mr MoneyBags.Originally posted by minestrone View PostReading that I do wish people would not blurt out fixed day rates, 300 hundred a day gets turned into 75 grand a year and then the message is instantly turned against us.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Why should Joe Bloggs care about the size of the contract market? Rates for contractors are pretty high and few will have sympathy for any rate cuts or the size of the market share diminishing. Being jobless and claiming unemployment due to being undercut by Bob is another matter.Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostYou see, what you have said there is still not correct. What we should calculate is the rate x number of contractors/bench. That way we can see the value of the contracting market and how it has changed!Comment
-
IMO the message should also be about the barely-above-minimum-wage rates being advertised for some highly skilled roles.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostThe message should be about the numbers being benched, not about taking rate cuts.Comment
-
-
And why we are bringing them in when there are people here that could do the work.Originally posted by BenchMaster View PostIMO the message should also be about the barely-above-minimum-wage rates being advertised for some highly skilled roles.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
I actually wish there was a more militant contractor group for IT folk.
I think the Bob situation could be easily sorted if some people got motivated and grew a big set of balls.
The PCG are so crap on this subject they honestly look to me like they work for the other camp.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Today 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Today 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Yesterday 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42
- Pay 2% to protect a ‘loan’. Settle it for 1–2%? The contractor debt mystery deepens Sep 10 06:30
- Napkin, anyone, for your next IT contract? Sep 9 06:11

Comment