Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
And on top of fraud is legal manipulation of the system, partners who have a relationship, but live apart to maximise the benfits as reported in last week's DT.
And on top of fraud is legal manipulation of the system, partners who have a relationship, but live apart to maximise the benfits as reported in last week's DT.
People that live over the road do that. Well, sort of. They say they don't live together but the bloke's there all the time, he just moves out when some official comes round to check up on them. It's great living in a cul-de-sac, really appeals to my nosy voyeuristic nature.
HMRC insists that it took the risk of fraud into account when tax credits first opened for business.
"From the first day... our working assumption was that we would be the target of attacks" by fraudsters, HMRC executive director David Varney told the House of Commons' Public Accounts Committee earlier in December.
"From the first day... our working assumption was that we would be the target of attacks"
....but obviously decided to do fuc all about it.
Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
Add in an IT system which badly underperformed - to the point where the company responsible, EDS, has had to pay HMRC £71m in compensation - and the stage was set for the meltdown which duly followed.
Of course given the incompetence of EDS with this high profile Government debacle you can rest assured that the Government would never,ever,never never never never, not on your nelly, once bitten twice shy, award them another mega contract courtesy of the taxes from all those hard working familys.
Not in a month of Sundays, theyre not that stupid silly.
Add in an IT system which badly underperformed - to the point where the company responsible, EDS, has had to pay HMRC £71m in compensation - and the stage was set for the meltdown which duly followed.
Of course given the incompetence of EDS with this high profile Government debacle you can rest assured that the Government would never,ever,never never never never, not on your nelly, once bitten twice shy, award them another mega contract courtesy of the taxes from all those hard working familys.
Not in a month of Sundays, theyre not that stupid silly.
Well ?
Exactly. They would NEVER be THAT stupid. Noo noo nooo. So instead they will award contracts to competent people - such as us. Won't they?
Some while back there was a study done of government IT contracts. What they found is that they are negotiated by civil servants with little or no experience of negotiating big contracts, and no experience of dealing with the slick front-men put forward by large companies such as EDS. Hence they are out of their depth, and get carried away with slick presentations and promises, and end up singing bad contracts. The company with the biggest promises wins, with insufficient clauses in the contracts to punish them if they happen to knowingly promise more than they can deliver.
But then again, I expect that I've not told you lot anything new ...
I'm often surprised by the incompetence of government bodies. I was taken to court without my knowledge and fined £100 by Slough council for a mistake that they made. But fighting their lawyers was not worth the hassle. I was advised "Just pay". The HMC&E cancelled my VAT account when they sent a letter to my old address, and it was returned maked "not known at this address". Their main database had my correct address cos I'd told them when I moved. And IR keep sending me letters for numerous people I have never heard of, but who apparently are employed by my company. And they refuse to do anything about it. Clear proof that state controlled command economies are better than private enterprise.
Comment