Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
2006-7 GERS figures, with North Sea Oil included, are £49.885 billion income, £49.884 expenditure. A modest surplus but a surplus nonetheless.
Yes it said 03/04 in my original post as well. The numbers I gave also exclude oil revenue, which makes sense seeing as it's a natural resource that belongs to everyone in the UK. I suspect with outthat in the 06/07 figures they would still run a defiicit.
Anyway, london & the south east doesn't run a deficit, the rest of the UK does, with the possible exception of scotland if you count the oil money.
The point is, this is not so different to the eurozone with herman doing all the work while the rest of them drink ouzo / vino / guiness and strike. It's perfectly sustainable as long as the germans give them enough money to keep buying BMWs and washing machines.
And just like Greece, I doubt anyone would lend the Scottish money at the rates the UK as a whole gets.
Yes it said 03/04 in my original post as well. The numbers I gave also exclude oil revenue, which makes sense seeing as it's a natural resource that belongs to everyone in the UK.
Anyway, london & the south east doesn't run a deficit, the rest of the UK does, with the possible exception of scotland if you count the oil money.
London and the South East doesn't run a deficit because the rest of the country does its business there. Not because the business is generated by London, but because it's the capital. As in my example, Scotch Whisky sales are London revenue? On paper, yes.
Comment