• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Dispatches: Behind Enemy Lines

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by cailin maith View Post
    Doesn't matter how many IMO - it's too many anyway
    WSS.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Churchill View Post
      Wiki - 1,618 killed (US: 978, UK: 253, Other: 387)[15]
      1 POW (US)[16]
      9,535+ wounded (US: 4,869,[17] UK: 3,360,[18]
      Contractors:75 killed, 2,428 wounded (to 2007/03)[19]

      The 500+ was a round-about(ish) figure.

      Does it really matter?
      You a bit touchy? It sounded high, to say we were losing 500+ per year, and it is, based on those figures. You're looking at a loss of around 200 per year.

      That aside, one is too many, as has already been said...
      Older and ...well, just older!!

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
        You a bit touchy? It sounded high, to say we were losing 500+ per year, and it is, based on those figures. You're looking at a loss of around 200 per year.

        That aside, one is too many, as has already been said...
        500+ is last year.

        When we were bombing them from the skies, casualties were much lower.

        There's a chart on the wiki.
        ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by zeitghost
          Are you sure they just milk the goats?
          You'll find what you're looking for on youtube somewhere. A video recorded through NVGs if I remember correctly...

          Older and ...well, just older!!

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by zeitghost
            Are you sure they just milk the goats?
            Travel insurance was a tad expensive so I did not want to go check it out in person...

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by AtW View Post
              Travel insurance was a tad expensive so I did not want to go check it out in person...
              That and the fact that if the Mujis got hold of you they'd cut you dick off, stick it in your mouth and leave your dismembered body to be found by your colleagues?

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by Churchill View Post
                That and the fact that if the Mujis got hold of you they'd cut you dick off, stick it in your mouth and leave your dismembered body to be found by your colleagues?
                You won't shock me by these stories old chap - this has been known to me to happen long time before NATO got into Afghanistan, not just there mind you - Chechnya springs to mind.

                To be fair cutting heads of hostages would be more usual thing to expect there.

                Knowledge of this helps reduce surrender rate among troops...

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by zeitghost
                  Don't the gooley chits work anymore then?

                  http://www.britains-smallwars.com/Mu...nal/gooly.html
                  In the well endowed regiments of the British army, such as I was in, the main danger is that they would cut your head off and stick it in the mouth of yer willy




                  (\__/)
                  (>'.'<)
                  ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by zeitghost
                    Don't the gooley chits work anymore then?

                    http://www.britains-smallwars.com/Mu...nal/gooly.html
                    It was the treatment of Russians during their occupation of Afghanistan that I was referring to.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by Churchill View Post
                      It was the treatment of Russians during their occupation of Afghanistan that I was referring to.
                      If they were able to capture enough of NATO troops then they'd be doing the same in my view, it wasn't anti-Russian thing, more of anti-infidel kind of thingy, apparently.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X