• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Dispatches: Behind Enemy Lines

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Do you really think that if the Muj's were anything but inbred fuqwits we'd have been shown the video?
    I did think that whilst watching it, but I think Dispatches still has a bit of integrity about it. That said, I doubt they'd have shown video of squaddies being blown up on national TV.
    ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
      I did think that whilst watching it, but I think Dispatches still has a bit of integrity about it. That said, I doubt they'd have shown video of squaddies being blown up on national TV.
      We wouldn't be losing 500+ a year if all the insurgents were as represented by that video last night.

      Comment


        #13
        It was an interesting documentary I thought.

        While detonating the roadside bomb whilst testing the remote was comedy gold the programme did highlight a number of things.

        The fighters seemed to be bored boys\men with nothing better to do than fight guerrilla warfare. Some seemed to believe in what they were fighting for but I got the impression the rest were controlled by the few and would have preferred to be elsewhere. The police didnt seem much better.

        They received support wherever they went in the countryside, but you couldnt tell if the support they received was freely given or if it was provided through fear or for profit.

        Unfortunately the biggest impression was that unless something changes then we face a very long war that we will eventually lose. They aren't going to go away.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Churchill View Post
          We wouldn't be losing 500+ a year if all the insurgents were as represented by that video last night.
          Who's 'we'?
          Older and ...well, just older!!

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Churchill View Post
            We wouldn't be losing 500+ a year if all the insurgents were as represented by that video last night.
            Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
            Who's 'we'?
            Where I am sat I can see and hear the repatriation aircraft fly into RAF Lyneham. Wootton Bassett is a couple of miles away. This repatriation is happening in every country that contributes towards what is happening in Afghanistan.

            Who do you think I'm talking about when I say "we"?

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
              Who's 'we'?
              Britain and her allies.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Scary View Post
                Britain and her allies.
                Ah, the coalition of the willing.

                I just wanted to check those figures churchy, where are they from?
                Older and ...well, just older!!

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
                  Ah, the coalition of the willing.

                  I just wanted to check those figures churchy, where are they from?
                  Wiki - 1,618 killed (US: 978, UK: 253, Other: 387)[15]
                  1 POW (US)[16]
                  9,535+ wounded (US: 4,869,[17] UK: 3,360,[18]
                  Contractors:75 killed, 2,428 wounded (to 2007/03)[19]

                  The 500+ was a round-about(ish) figure.

                  Does it really matter?

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by M_B View Post
                    Some seemed to believe in what they were fighting for but I got the impression the rest were controlled by the few and would have preferred to be elsewhere.
                    This sounds like description of NATO forces there.

                    Historically Afgans were very good at doing what they do now - it's probably the meaning of their lifes to fight such wars and die in them. Average life expectancy is pretty low there anyway and dieing on path of jihad might sound much more attractive than milking goats.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Churchill View Post
                      Wiki - 1,618 killed (US: 978, UK: 253, Other: 387)[15]
                      1 POW (US)[16]
                      9,535+ wounded (US: 4,869,[17] UK: 3,360,[18]
                      Contractors:75 killed, 2,428 wounded (to 2007/03)[19]

                      The 500+ was a round-about(ish) figure.

                      Does it really matter?
                      Doesn't matter how many IMO - it's too many anyway
                      Bazza gets caught
                      Socrates - "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."

                      CUK University Challenge Champions 2010

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X