• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

transvestite wives

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    I would like to commend the following document detailing some of the works performed by Freemasons.

    http://www.grandcharity.org/data/fil...09__dec_09.pdf

    You may see something of particular interest to your own particular condition. I mean MS, not your attitude problem.
    This year we are hoping to provide grant aid for attitude adjustment
    Confusion is a natural state of being

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by minestrone View Post
      So we are not allowed to call transvestites freaks then?
      No matey.

      There's nothing that explicility says so in the T&C's, however Rule 3 is a general catchall for such misdemeanours.

      Should the rules be more explicit and firmed up ? Not for me to say. But you can see how they can get firmed up by provocation.
      Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

      C.S. Lewis

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Board Game Geek View Post
        No matey.
        Are we allowed to call them ma’am?
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          #34
          BGG, this site has always been conservative with a small c. Which is why many posters neither like or understand anything that is considered alternative.
          The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

          But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
            Your welcome. I notice at the very mention of a troll Minestrone pops his head up.

            I just find it interesting the usual heart sinks on here think that the right to wear clothing of the opposite sex is more important than a person's right to hold an opinion.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by minestrone View Post
              I just find it interesting the usual heart sinks on here think that the right to wear clothing of the opposite sex is more important than a person's right to hold an opinion.
              Right on!

              Comment


                #37
                In AeroSpace, well anyone whose worked that sector can tell you. Lots of transvestites. It doesn't get in the way. So why worry, and what's the beef?
                Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by minestrone View Post
                  I just find it interesting the usual heart sinks on here think that the right to wear clothing of the opposite sex is more important than a person's right to hold an opinion.
                  Whatever happened to freedom of speech?

                  I think we should ban Scotsmen from wearing those tartan skirts too
                  Confusion is a natural state of being

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
                    I just find it interesting the usual heart sinks on here think that the right to wear clothing of the opposite sex is more important than a person's right to hold an opinion.
                    This is the problem with ‘rights’. Rights can be weighed up against each other, listed on pieces of paper and then given to some people and taken away from others. I prefer the concept of ‘liberty’, which covers both these matters and allows for people to wear clothes of the opposite sex, which may be offensive to some people AND express an opinion which may be offensive to some people.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      #40
                      If I called someone a n*gger, is that an opinion or abuse, or prejudice?


                      Similarly if someone declares x population are freaks, that sounds like a prejudice. Or possibly closet tendencies

                      I don't mind small minded people outing themselves though, it identifies who to avoid.
                      The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

                      But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X