- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
transvestite wives
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Describing anybody as a freak is pretty unfriendly.Originally posted by minestrone View PostSo if a bearded man in a laura ashley dress is not a freak who is?
Have the hand ringers on here banned the word freak?"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
I had something similar happen to me the other week actually.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostThis is the point. You can only really define an offensive remark in the light of the subject’s emotional response to the remark. Each person decides for himself what he finds offensive. If I were to say ‘God doesn’t exist’, as I believe, then some people could choose to find that offensive. Am I then making an offensive remark? If I go a step further and say ‘God is an evil entity who is no better than Satan’, am I being offensive? To some people, yes, but to others who choose to ignore the remark or who don’t believe in God, no.
I was doing a video not on MS, and had thought my script was free of swear words.
After posting up on you tube, I got 2 complains for swearing.
I was mortified.
I checked my script again and again until with horrible, sudden dawning, I found the phrase "A hell of a lot" in my script.
I then realised that my detractors were from the Bible Belt's of America, and consequently, my use of the word "hell" had offended them.
It was used in innocence, yes, but they were were offended.
I then thought about it for a while, and came to the conclusion that whilst I could claim innocence, perhaps ignorance on my part would be a better charge. That doesn't make it right. It just means I need to be more aware and cautious in what I say.
I've realised that when doing you tube videos, you have to weigh up what's more important. Getting the message across, or alienating your intended audience.
For this particular video, it was getting the message across, so did I achieve 100% coverage ? No.
Mich is correct in the way's things can be interpreted, and as far as I am concerned, it just means you have to work a little harder that's all. It's no big deal to me.Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
C.S. LewisComment
-
I'd suggest you stay away from any town when Scotland are playing locally.Originally posted by mr_woo View PostWhat people do in their own houses with the curtains closed is up to them. A hairy *rsed bloke walking round town in a wig and a frock in front of families, he be a freak!
and as for women in trousers...
mmmm shapely bottoms.Comment
-
Is a hand ringer another opinion? How about twat? is that an opinion or a suitable name to describe you?Originally posted by minestrone View PostSo if a bearded man in a laura ashley dress is not a freak who is?
Have the hand ringers on here banned the word freak?The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.
But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”Comment
-
Sorry ! My fault !Originally posted by Bagpuss View PostIn what respect?
conservative with a small c...
"This term is also used in the United Kingdom to describe those who are conservative in the sense of resisting radical change rather than being members of supporters of the official Conservative Party"
I retract my comment. I completely misread it another way. It was nothing to do with big C's or little c's !
Doh !Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
C.S. LewisComment
-
*cough*Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostDescribing anybody as a freak is pretty unfriendly.
http://forums.contractoruk.com/919422-post4.htmlComment
-
My other half has to do exactly that. Thing is, the fella is over 60 and came to work in thigh high boots and a mini skirt.Originally posted by minestrone View PostWell to be honest I would rather not work with a 6 foot 20 stone bearded man called Florence in a Laura Ashley dress.
If anyone thinks that kind of display is normal then they should reevaluate their outlook on life.
As I'm entitled to an opinion, I feel that is behaviour warranting the term 'freak'...Older and ...well, just older!!Comment
-
Yes, I'm an unfriendly hypocrite sometimes.Originally posted by minestrone View Post
Edit: but if anybody's offering some genetic mutations, I'll have some of Usain's.Last edited by Moscow Mule; 29 January 2010, 13:46."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
It's unusual perhaps.Originally posted by ratewhore View PostMy other half has to do exactly that. Thing is, the fella is over 60 and came to work in thigh high boots and a mini skirt.
As I'm entitled to an opinion, I feel that is behaviour warranting the term 'freak'...
But why can't people wear what they want to wear without comment or censure ?
Why can we be so obsessed with people's attire ?
I think I might need to read the Naked Ape again....Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
C.S. LewisComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- National Minimum Wage increase: operational for most umbrella staff, but brace for impact Mar 19 09:13
- Contractors, Joint & Several Liability’s unintended consequences are already piling up Mar 18 07:29
- Contractors, did you know self-employed DBS Checks have changed, for the better? Mar 17 07:56
- Offshoring harms already fraught IT contractors. Here’s what ministers can do Mar 16 07:57
- Dividends in 2026/27: an expert’s explainer for contractors Mar 13 07:20
- Dividends in 2026/27: an expert’s explainer for contractors Mar 13 07:04
- Contracting Awards 2026 opens for entries — with new AI category Mar 12 07:26
- Contracting Awards 2026 opens for entries — with new AI category Mar 12 07:26
- Contractors, beware these four traps in the UK’s Statutory Residence Test Mar 11 08:18
- Contractors, beware these four traps in the UK’s Statutory Residence Test Mar 11 00:23

Comment