Tax dodging scum

[AtW]

If the government had spent the last 12 years spending the money they had received instead of spending the money they’d like to have received the UK wouldn’t be in such a bloody mess.

Oh feck off whining about Govt wasting money, they all do.

Everyone has got to be under same rules, tax or otherwise - people who get 3.5% tax dodge are way over the line of doubt whether it's right or wrong, when that happens to threaten Govt's revenues it's just a matter of time before example is made that such strategies are short term and won't work.

[Clippy]

"Here is the 10 o'clock news, with Fiona Bruce's substitute, Dave"

"And now that local news has been offshored, here is Bob with what's happening in Uttar Pradesh."

[DimPrawn]

Oh flip off whining about Govt wasting money, they all do.

Everyone has got to be under same rules, tax or otherwise - people who get 3.5% tax dodge are way over the line of doubt whether it's right or wrong, when that happens to threaten Govt's revenues it's just a matter of time before example is made that such strategies are short term and won't work.

Haven't you got work to be doing?

We need your company to make £££ billions so that Gordon can cream off the profits.

[TheFaQQer]

It's ok QDOS checked their contract, all is well

QDOS now add "Please note that our opinion is given from the background of many years of HMRC experience, but we are unable to guarantee a successful outcome to any HMRC challenge. You must ensure that your actual working practices are also compliant, or any positive elements of the written contract will be rendered worthless." to the end of their contract reviews, I notice

[PAH]

We need your company to make £££ billions so you can give all these benched contractors some work.

Amen to that. About time we got some payback for supporting AtW all these years.

[AtW]

Haven't you got work to be doing?

You are right - I need to calculate VAT and pay it, don't want to be seen as a tax dodger of any kind by Her Majesty's most majestik Revenue and Customs

[PAH]

QDOS now add "Please note that our opinion is given from the background of many years of HMRC experience, but we are unable to guarantee a successful outcome to any HMRC challenge. You must ensure that your actual working practices are also compliant, or any positive elements of the written contract will be rendered worthless." to the end of their contract reviews, I notice

Standard arse covering tactics.

At the end of the day everyone is responsible for their own actions. If you over rely on third parties and trust them to know what they are doing and believe what they say you may come unstuck.

Always been like that.

[Sysman]

Of course

They are somebody

You are nobody

HTH

Bread and circuses providers.

Not to mention mouthpieces of NL policeee

[TheFaQQer]

Standard arse covering tactics.

At the end of the day everyone is responsible for their own actions. If you over rely on third parties and trust them to know what they are doing and believe what they say you may come unstuck.

Always been like that.

It's not always been like that, though - I have had a few reviews done which don't add the disclaimer. I wonder if it's since Dragonfly, or maybe it's just been missing from some of my other reviews...

[Mich the Tester]

Oh flip off whining about Govt wasting money, they all do.

Everyone has got to be under same rules, tax or otherwise - people who get 3.5% tax dodge are way over the line of doubt whether it's right or wrong, when that happens to threaten Govt's revenues it's just a matter of time before example is made that such strategies are short term and won't work.

I said nothing about wasting money. I said that government should not spend more money than they have.