Reply to: Tax dodging scum

[Mich the Tester]

Oh flip off whining about Govt wasting money, they all do.

Everyone has got to be under same rules, tax or otherwise - people who get 3.5% tax dodge are way over the line of doubt whether it's right or wrong, when that happens to threaten Govt's revenues it's just a matter of time before example is made that such strategies are short term and won't work.

I said nothing about wasting money. I said that government should not spend more money than they have.

[TheFaQQer]

Standard arse covering tactics.

At the end of the day everyone is responsible for their own actions. If you over rely on third parties and trust them to know what they are doing and believe what they say you may come unstuck.

Always been like that.

It's not always been like that, though - I have had a few reviews done which don't add the disclaimer. I wonder if it's since Dragonfly, or maybe it's just been missing from some of my other reviews...

[Sysman]

Of course

They are somebody

You are nobody

HTH

Bread and circuses providers.

Not to mention mouthpieces of NL policeee

[PAH]

QDOS now add "Please note that our opinion is given from the background of many years of HMRC experience, but we are unable to guarantee a successful outcome to any HMRC challenge. You must ensure that your actual working practices are also compliant, or any positive elements of the written contract will be rendered worthless." to the end of their contract reviews, I notice

Standard arse covering tactics.

At the end of the day everyone is responsible for their own actions. If you over rely on third parties and trust them to know what they are doing and believe what they say you may come unstuck.

Always been like that.

[AtW]

Haven't you got work to be doing?

You are right - I need to calculate VAT and pay it, don't want to be seen as a tax dodger of any kind by Her Majesty's most majestik Revenue and Customs

[PAH]

We need your company to make £££ billions so you can give all these benched contractors some work.

Amen to that. About time we got some payback for supporting AtW all these years.

[TheFaQQer]

It's ok QDOS checked their contract, all is well

QDOS now add "Please note that our opinion is given from the background of many years of HMRC experience, but we are unable to guarantee a successful outcome to any HMRC challenge. You must ensure that your actual working practices are also compliant, or any positive elements of the written contract will be rendered worthless." to the end of their contract reviews, I notice

[DimPrawn]

Oh flip off whining about Govt wasting money, they all do.

Everyone has got to be under same rules, tax or otherwise - people who get 3.5% tax dodge are way over the line of doubt whether it's right or wrong, when that happens to threaten Govt's revenues it's just a matter of time before example is made that such strategies are short term and won't work.

Haven't you got work to be doing?

We need your company to make £££ billions so that Gordon can cream off the profits.

[Clippy]

"Here is the 10 o'clock news, with Fiona Bruce's substitute, Dave"

"And now that local news has been offshored, here is Bob with what's happening in Uttar Pradesh."

[AtW]

If the government had spent the last 12 years spending the money they had received instead of spending the money they’d like to have received the UK wouldn’t be in such a bloody mess.

Oh feck off whining about Govt wasting money, they all do.

Everyone has got to be under same rules, tax or otherwise - people who get 3.5% tax dodge are way over the line of doubt whether it's right or wrong, when that happens to threaten Govt's revenues it's just a matter of time before example is made that such strategies are short term and won't work.

[Mich the Tester]

"Here is the 10 o'clock news, with Fiona Bruce's substitute, Dave"

Kate Silverton

[Mich the Tester]

Well it costs a lot of money to go to court and stuff, also they certainly hoped people will be sensible enough to stay away from it. As soon as it became clear that damage to taxpayer is high and further inaction will open the flood gates they did act. Is it too slow as some people allege?

Not sure, I'd say it makes sense to avoid giving straight answer every time it's asked - this way they'll spend all their time (and taxpayers money) helping people enrich themselves by robbing the taxpayers.

If the government had spent the last 12 years spending the money they had received instead of spending the money they’d like to have received the UK wouldn’t be in such a bloody mess.

[DimPrawn]

It's ok QDOS checked their contract, all is well

"Here is the 10 o'clock news, with Fiona Bruce's substitute, Dave"

[AtW]

Only because there were too many jumping on the bandwagon. Took them long enough to get pissed off didn't it.

Well it costs a lot of money to go to court and stuff, also they certainly hoped people will be sensible enough to stay away from it. As soon as it became clear that damage to taxpayer is high and further inaction will open the flood gates they did act. Is it too slow as some people allege?

Not sure, I'd say it makes sense to avoid giving straight answer every time it's asked - this way they'll spend all their time (and taxpayers money) helping people enrich themselves by robbing the taxpayers.

[Jeebo72]

This has been kicking around for ages, but surely a quick investigation would find that they are disguised employees and have to pay the tax?

It's ok QDOS checked their contract, all is well