Originally posted by chef
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
BN66; what the hell is going on over there?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
and there are figures of 300k etc. that some would be due to "owe" to HMRC if they ultimately lose.. that even made my stomach churn.The proud owner of 125 Xeno Geek PointsComment
-
I can't be arsed to trawl through the BN66 thread. Are you saying that if the Tories got in they've promised to drop the BN66 case? Not taking the piss, I genuinely don't know....And the lord said unto John; "come forth and receive eternal life." But John came fifth and won a toaster.Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostNow then, seeing as I live in Euroland and am subject to a different Soviet tax regime, I don’t really know the details, but I do know that the UK government have set up retrospective legislation to close a ‘loophole’ that existed since 1987 and lots of people are now confronted with enormous tax bills they never expected to receive.
Parliament was also entitled, having regard to the background that I have set out, to legislate with retrospective effect, particularly in order to ensure a "fair balance" between the interests of the great body of resident taxpayers who paid income tax on their income from a trade or profession in the normal way, and the taxpayers, like the Claimant, who had sought to exploit, by artificial arrangements, the DTA, in plain contravention of the important public policy set out above, and in full knowledge of how Parliament had maintained that public policy after Padmore (1987).Comment
-
Originally posted by b0redom View PostI can't be arsed to trawl through the BN66 thread. Are you saying that if the Tories got in they've promised to drop the BN66 case? Not taking the piss, I genuinely don't know....And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by Iron Condor View PostThis is what the judge said.
Parliament was also entitled, having regard to the background that I have set out, to legislate with retrospective effect, particularly in order to ensure a "fair balance" between the interests of the great body of resident taxpayers who paid income tax on their income from a trade or profession in the normal way, and the taxpayers, like the Claimant, who had sought to exploit, by artificial arrangements, the DTA, in plain contravention of the important public policy set out above, and in full knowledge of how Parliament had maintained that public policy after Padmore (1987).And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post'Entitled' does not equal 'sensible'.
Artificial arrangements for avoiding tax are not sensible in my opinion.Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post'Entitled' does not equal 'sensible'.Comment
-
Originally posted by Iron Condor View PostIf the taxpayer is not going to be sensible they dont deserve sense in return.
Artificial arrangements for avoiding tax are not sensible in my opinion.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostWhat was the total amount of tax actually paid in these arrangements vs what would have normally been?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment