• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Say hello to HMRC

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Board Game Geek View Post
    Strip away the uniform, and you'll find human beings underneath, just doing their job.
    No. Lizards.
    If you think my attitude stinks, you should smell my fingers.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Board Game Geek View Post
      Oh you are a bunch of nasty meanies !

      HMRC are staffed by people, just like us.

      Male, female, with hopes, dreams, desires and families.

      Strip away the uniform, and you'll find human beings underneath, just doing their job.

      (Which incidentally, is exactly what the members of the Schutzstaffel used to say in their defence)
      And the rejects get sent to work for the DWP.
      How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

      Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
      Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

      "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Board Game Geek View Post
        Oh you are a bunch of nasty meanies !

        HMRC are staffed by people, just like us.

        Male, female, with hopes, dreams, desires and families.

        Strip away the uniform, and you'll find human beings underneath, just doing their job.

        (Which incidentally, is exactly what the members of the Schutzstaffel used to say in their defence)
        If you prrick them, do they not bleed?


        Mods, I'm not trying to use a naughty word, but I can hardly quote the Bard in my own words, can I?
        Last edited by Tarquin Farquhar; 25 January 2010, 14:43.
        Step outside posh boy

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Board Game Geek View Post
          Oh you are a bunch of nasty meanies !

          HMRC are staffed by people, just like us.

          Male, female, with hopes, dreams, desires and families.

          Strip away the uniform, and you'll find human beings underneath, just doing their job.

          (Which incidentally, is exactly what the members of the Schutzstaffel used to say in their defence)
          and be free to grab ar** when drunk in a bar http://forums.contractoruk.com/1054843-post18.html
          This default font is sooooooooooooo boring and so are short usernames

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by MPwannadecentincome View Post
            of course HMRC might not have monkeys, they might have written some software to intelligently highlight the interesting posts. If not then, an interesting question to you all, if a contract was available to write such a system would you take this contract?
            Yes, and I did, allegedly.

            HTH

            Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
            threadeds website, and here's my blog.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by threaded View Post
              Yes, and I did, allegedly.

              HTH

              Nurse, Threaded needs his medication.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by Churchill View Post
                Nurse, Threaded needs his medication.
                And I wrote quite substantial parts of the new Child Support System too.

                Who's laughing now fat boy!

                Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by threaded View Post
                  And I wrote quite substantial parts of the new Child Support System too.

                  Who's laughing now fat boy!

                  No you didn't, you posted/boasted on here that you could write a CSA system better than the current(at the time one).

                  I'm laughing at you Walter and I ain't fat.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
                    No you didn't, you posted/boasted on here that you could write a CSA system better than the current(at the time one).

                    I'm laughing at you Walter and I ain't fat.
                    Err, they bought it, it was announced on their website.

                    And yes you are fat, and the fatter you get, the sadder you get.
                    Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                    threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by threaded View Post
                      Err, they bought it, it was announced on their website.
                      And yes you are fat, and the fatter you get, the sadder you get.
                      Of course they did.

                      Linky?

                      The Child Support Agency (CSA) IT system has been branded one of the "worst public administration scandals in modern times" after it was revealed the cost will now rise to £1.1bn.

                      A National Audit Office (NAO) report this week has found that the CSA spends 70 pence for every £1 it collects and has a backlog of 300,000 cases, with each case taking an average of nine months to process instead of the six-week target.

                      At the heart of the problems is the CS2 IT system developed by EDS, which has cost £539m to roll out to date. That is expected to rise to £768m by 2010 plus a £321m rescue plan announced recently, which takes the total cost to £1.1bn.

                      EDS has received £152m in payment for the IT system to date and that is expected to rise to a total of £381m — £46m less than the original contract value when the deal was signed in 2000.

                      An estimated 36,000 new cases have become "stuck" in the system due to IT failures and are currently unable to progress without manual intervention by the CSA staff.

                      Around 19,000 of these are now being progressed clerically, outside CS2, where the customer has made an official complaint to the CSA, and the NAO said this number is likely to increase until new software is released that enables the stuck cases to progress through the system.

                      Despite the "substantial" amount of work undertaken to resolve defects in CS2 since it went live in 2003, the NAO found that some 600 manual workarounds still exist and a large number of cases are experiencing technical problems. The NAO report also found that although all the software fixes in the last year have been delivered successfully and on time, there are still 500 faults with CS2 that have to be dealt with, three years after the system went live.

                      The CSA said the IT system won't be running at the originally expected level until the end of next year. Sir John Bourn, the head of the NAO, said in a statement: "These problems will have caused genuine hardship and distress to many parents and their children. From design to delivery and operation, the programme to reform the Agency has been beset with problems which the Department for Work and Pensions, the Agency and its IT supplier EDS have struggled to deal with."

                      Edward Leigh, chairman of the Public Accounts Committee, branded the fiasco one of the "worst public administration scandals in modern times" and said the facts "beggar belief".

                      He said in a statement: "Ignoring ample warnings, the DWP, the CSA and IT contractor EDS introduced a large, complex IT system at the same time as restructuring the Agency. The new system was brought in and, as night follows day, stumbled and now has enormous operational difficulties."
                      Last edited by Churchill; 25 January 2010, 15:05.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X