I wonder if DH was also "Julius Caesar", who made one slightly bizarre post and hasn't been heard of since.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Farewell!
Collapse
X
-
-
Dunno, they both had the belief that they were raising serious world issues for debate.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostI wonder if DH was also "Julius Caesar", who made one slightly bizarre post and hasn't been heard of since.
As if we hadnt done it all before, and as if we had any real influence on anything anyway
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Here! Sorry it took so long i had the turtles head. I am thinking of changing my forum name to dogs starboard conker, it seems a bit more upmarket. Where is dogs heinous?Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostIt just goes to show that theres more to being on a forum that just having a funny name and a funny av.


now where is Dogs left conker ?Comment
-
Sniffing it or sipping?Originally posted by Dogs left conker View PostHere! Sorry it took so long i had the turtles head. I am thinking of changing my forum name to dogs starboard conker, it seems a bit more upmarket. Where is dogs heinous?I'm not even an atheist so much as I am an antitheist; I not only maintain that all religions are versions of the same untruth, but I hold that the influence of churches, and the effect of religious belief, is positively harmful. [Christopher Hitchens]Comment
-
We seem to have some new
s
today.
I would say welcome but mehmerely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Clicked one of NF's links to se what this was all about and was dismayed to see SAS was back. Before noticing the whole thread is ancient and he posted in 2009! Phew!bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
Indeed.Originally posted by AtW View PostDrama queen. First get a few thousand posts and a couple of years of CUKing under your belt for your threat to leave to be remotely interesting to rhino skinned CUKed who've seen it all on here...

And you have got to have confessed to having banged a sexy cleaner to have any credibility too.
Well OK imagined credibility then..
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Today 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Yesterday 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42
- Pay 2% to protect a ‘loan’. Settle it for 1–2%? The contractor debt mystery deepens Sep 10 06:30
- Napkin, anyone, for your next IT contract? Sep 9 06:11
- 52 contractors told us what they think of Andy Burnham. Basically: not much, yet. Sep 8 06:02

Comment