Originally posted by AtW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
A Victory for Common Sense
Collapse
X
-
To prove that the US government will have to tell the court, in public, where the servers are. Is that really wise?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
Well then, let's have open season here: sit in UK in front of a computer, do all sort of nasty things in foreign countries and it's all kewl? That's not exactly the view that Western Justice shares.Originally posted by Not So Wise View PostHe is a criminal under US law, no doubt, but he is was not in the US when he commited the "crime" nor is he now, so those US laws don't and should not applyComment
-
Well, servers were at known physical locations where known US Govt buildings are located - nothing unwise saying that there are computers at Langley, which happens to be the place where CIA HQ is.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostTo prove that the US government will have to tell the court, in public, where the servers are. Is that really wise?Comment
-
Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View PostFor those who have labeled MckInnon a crimnal (what pecuniary advantage did he profit from and what damage did he actually do apart from showing that NASAs IT dept was pretty sloppy with its security policy)'.
How then do you explain the fact that hackers from China have acquired much information from the US government/industry and penetrated US financial institutions - yet the US has chosen not to persue such Chinese hackers .
I suspect McKinnon was at most an embaressment to certain US authotities and being a Brit a 'soft target' under the current unfair Extradition Treaty (to be revised by the Conservatives) - it strikes me the whole episode is rather shameful.
You don't have to obtain advantage to be a criminal.
I don't disagree with you that McKinnon is a soft target, but to suggest he's done nothing wrong - and didn't know he was doing wrong - is blinkered at best."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Which is exactly what the Chinese hackers (employed by Chinese Communist Goverment agencies) have been doing with impunity - or perhaps they are not criminals - but just doing their wee bit for Greater Communist China Atw ?Originally posted by AtW View PostWell then, let's have open season here: sit in UK in front of a computer, do all sort of nasty things in foreign countries and it's all kewl? That's not exactly the view that Western Justice shares.Comment
-
All of them? IP numbers please.Originally posted by AtW View PostWell, servers were at known physical locations where known US Govt buildings are located - nothing unwise saying that there are computers at Langley, which happens to be the place where CIA HQ is.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
So if I spend a day surfing for porn and then checking out some human rights organisations while sitting behind a PC in Holland, I can be prosecuted in China for viewing illegal websites?Originally posted by AtW View PostWell then, let's have open season here: sit in UK in front of a computer, do all sort of nasty things in foreign countries and it's all kewl? That's not exactly the view that Western Justice shares.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
If he hacked say...Iran, North Korea, China would he be considered Criminal or Hero by "western justice"?Originally posted by AtW View PostWell then, let's have open season here: sit in UK in front of a computer, do all sort of nasty things in foreign countries and it's all kewl? That's not exactly the view that Western Justice shares.
The view of "western justice" (especially USA) shares is "did the criminal do something naughty in a country we like/dislike and more importantly do they have any political clout with us"
Like hell this is the country that refuses to presecute it's own mercenarys for raping one of it's own citizen's, in a country/zone controled by the US because "it did not happen on US soil"Last edited by Not So Wise; 14 January 2010, 11:46.Comment
-
Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View PostMcKinnon saved from Extradition -with full support from the Conservatives
Happy, happy, happy!
And regarding all subsequent posts, WAJPS.My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.Comment
-
One common principle for extraditions is that people who are accused of crime in country A would have also been prosecuted for this crime if they did it in country B where they are now.Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View PostWhich is exactly what the Chinese hackers (employed by Chinese Communist Goverment agencies) have been doing with impunity - or perhaps they are not criminals - but just doing their wee bit for Greater Communist China Atw ?
Based on this the Chinese hackers are probably not criminals as in all probability they are working for the Chinese Govt and thus do the kind of job MI5/6, CIA do.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Today 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Yesterday 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44

Comment