• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

A Victory for Common Sense

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Indeed. In this case crime was committed on US soil
    To prove that the US government will have to tell the court, in public, where the servers are. Is that really wise?
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Not So Wise View Post
      He is a criminal under US law, no doubt, but he is was not in the US when he commited the "crime" nor is he now, so those US laws don't and should not apply
      Well then, let's have open season here: sit in UK in front of a computer, do all sort of nasty things in foreign countries and it's all kewl? That's not exactly the view that Western Justice shares.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
        To prove that the US government will have to tell the court, in public, where the servers are. Is that really wise?
        Well, servers were at known physical locations where known US Govt buildings are located - nothing unwise saying that there are computers at Langley, which happens to be the place where CIA HQ is.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View Post
          For those who have labeled MckInnon a crimnal (what pecuniary advantage did he profit from and what damage did he actually do apart from showing that NASAs IT dept was pretty sloppy with its security policy)'.

          How then do you explain the fact that hackers from China have acquired much information from the US government/industry and penetrated US financial institutions - yet the US has chosen not to persue such Chinese hackers .

          I suspect McKinnon was at most an embaressment to certain US authotities and being a Brit a 'soft target' under the current unfair Extradition Treaty (to be revised by the Conservatives) - it strikes me the whole episode is rather shameful.

          You don't have to obtain advantage to be a criminal.

          I don't disagree with you that McKinnon is a soft target, but to suggest he's done nothing wrong - and didn't know he was doing wrong - is blinkered at best.
          ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by AtW View Post
            Well then, let's have open season here: sit in UK in front of a computer, do all sort of nasty things in foreign countries and it's all kewl? That's not exactly the view that Western Justice shares.
            Which is exactly what the Chinese hackers (employed by Chinese Communist Goverment agencies) have been doing with impunity - or perhaps they are not criminals - but just doing their wee bit for Greater Communist China Atw ?

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by AtW View Post
              Well, servers were at known physical locations where known US Govt buildings are located - nothing unwise saying that there are computers at Langley, which happens to be the place where CIA HQ is.
              All of them? IP numbers please.
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by AtW View Post
                Well then, let's have open season here: sit in UK in front of a computer, do all sort of nasty things in foreign countries and it's all kewl? That's not exactly the view that Western Justice shares.
                So if I spend a day surfing for porn and then checking out some human rights organisations while sitting behind a PC in Holland, I can be prosecuted in China for viewing illegal websites?
                And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by AtW View Post
                  Well then, let's have open season here: sit in UK in front of a computer, do all sort of nasty things in foreign countries and it's all kewl? That's not exactly the view that Western Justice shares.
                  If he hacked say...Iran, North Korea, China would he be considered Criminal or Hero by "western justice"?

                  The view of "western justice" (especially USA) shares is "did the criminal do something naughty in a country we like/dislike and more importantly do they have any political clout with us"

                  Like hell this is the country that refuses to presecute it's own mercenarys for raping one of it's own citizen's, in a country/zone controled by the US because "it did not happen on US soil"
                  Last edited by Not So Wise; 14 January 2010, 11:46.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View Post
                    McKinnon saved from Extradition -with full support from the Conservatives
                    Happy, happy, happy!

                    And regarding all subsequent posts, WAJPS.
                    My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View Post
                      Which is exactly what the Chinese hackers (employed by Chinese Communist Goverment agencies) have been doing with impunity - or perhaps they are not criminals - but just doing their wee bit for Greater Communist China Atw ?
                      One common principle for extraditions is that people who are accused of crime in country A would have also been prosecuted for this crime if they did it in country B where they are now.

                      Based on this the Chinese hackers are probably not criminals as in all probability they are working for the Chinese Govt and thus do the kind of job MI5/6, CIA do.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X