Originally posted by Gonzo
View Post
The question is therefore whether gun ownership in Ireland in 1991 was more liberal than that in UK in 2002.
It's hard to actually find good Irish gun control reference link (Google is a bit tulip, but since SKA isn't better just yet I won't whine too much about it).
Here is what I found however: Ahern signs new gun control act into law - dated 24 Jul 2009 (not 1991 the stats refer to).
"The act bans handguns in Ireland and also introduces a requirement for referees, background medical checks and standards for the safe keeping of guns in the home for all firearms licence applicants"
I infer from this that handguns were not banned before that time in Ireland, so in 1991 that the stats refer to handguns were legal, yet they had 5 times lower firearms homicide rate there than in the UK after guns were banned.
Maybe they are trying to get firearms homicite rate to zero, who knows - but it appears that a country that is fairly close to UK geographically and perhaps culturally had 5 times lower firearms homicide rate than UK after the ban.
It is true that they had higher suicide rate with firearms - that's the choice of a firearms owner.
------------
But that's NOT important.
Let's say risk of being shot with a firearm would double or triple in UK if they were made legal again. I'd take it because I'd feel that overall it is a very low risk anyway and I'd have a chance to resist very unlikely attack - worst case for me would be to die fighting with my firearm, even if it was used against me - I'd accept that risk easily alongside with hefty 3rd party insurance that should come with any firearms ownership.
The matter of fact is that every day 8-10 people die from car accidents, yet people accept it as price for being mobile - this is the same as being FREE to go from one place to another, heavy price, yet one worth paying. Proper fierarms ownership will have much lower price, yet much higher importance on one's freedom.
Comment