Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
There isn't a death penalty for trespass or stealing. If, in some psychotic world, that were the penalty, it would make existing penalties for more serious crimes ludicrous.
It's not a penalty - it's a counter action against criminal. Attack on a house is attack on personal safety - same with rape, or any other violence, the idea is to prevent them - once enough stupid criminals get shot then things will get better.
It's not a penalty - it's a counter action against criminal. Attack on a house is attack on personal safety - same with rape, or any other violence, the idea is to prevent them - once enough stupid criminals get shot then things will get better.
You assume the burglar will die, with no mention of wounding to disable etc. It's an execution and far worse than the original crime.
I think I've explained it pretty clearly, with 50% probability of either defender or attacker shot (dead or wounded bad enough), the attacker will have 90% chance of being shot after 3 attempts.
Given that scumbags like thieves, burglars are in big minority it means that those of them stupid enough to continue their activities (at least when people are in the house) will be dead or wouded.
Comment