• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

When are the bankers going to be punished for their failure?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Lockhouse View Post
    Personally I believe we should be encouraging banks to set up here, not encouraging them to leave.
    I agree.

    Problem is that almost all banks are gone already - the remaining entities are called "banks", but in reality they have become casinos that were gambling away not just depositors' money but also everyone else in the economy.

    Even mutuals/building societies got sucked into buying derivative bulltulip way beyond their remit - their job should have been to invest in this country, maybe in ventures that export stuff or discover new worlds, but as soon as they got into gambling that resulted in lack of investment in this country. Unless you call having bankers buying another set of houses as "investment". I guess that can sustain a million or so jobs in London, the rest of UK residents are redundant to this party of life.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by AtW View Post
      I agree.

      Problem is that almost all banks are gone already - the remaining entities are called "banks", but in reality they have become casinos that were gambling away not just depositors' money but also everyone else in the economy.

      .
      Sadly I agree with AtW. What is required is strict regulation and definition of banks vs investment companies.

      Banks should be restricted to simple lending, loans, mortgages, offering savings and pension products only. Any money these banks invest should be limited to AAA rated bonds, gilts only. They should not be allowed to sell the mortgages on, they must hold them and they must hold significant capital. Simple banking only, all lowish risk.

      Everything outside this should be classed as investment companies. They can do whatever they like, but if they lose money, tough, they go bust.

      Keep them separate and offer no protect to investors, shareholders or employees of investment companies.

      Comment


        #33
        The good thing about a new Glass-Steagall act is that there'll be lots of work for us - Boomed!
        ...my quagmire of greed....my cesspit of laziness and unfairness....all I am doing is sticking two fingers up at nurses, doctors and other hard working employed professionals...

        Comment


          #34
          So is it true that first £20k of bankers' bonuses is going to be taxed at 50%?

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
            Sadly I agree with AtW. What is required is strict regulation and definition of banks vs investment companies.

            Banks should be restricted to simple lending, loans, mortgages, offering savings and pension products only. Any money these banks invest should be limited to AAA rated bonds, gilts only. They should not be allowed to sell the mortgages on, they must hold them and they must hold significant capital. Simple banking only, all lowish risk.

            Everything outside this should be classed as investment companies. They can do whatever they like, but if they lose money, tough, they go bust.

            Keep them separate and offer no protect to investors, shareholders or employees of investment companies.
            That really make sense: go into politics DP
            Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death.

            Patience is something you admire in the driver behind you and scorn in the one ahead.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
              So is it true that first £20k of bankers' bonuses is going to be taxed at 50%?
              The BBC are saying it's anything over £10k.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by Bunk View Post
                The BBC are saying it's anything over £10k.
                They'll just pay themselves a double bonus.

                Sorteeed.

                Comment


                  #38
                  I've just read more about this. The banks will get hit with a one off 50% tax if they pay bonuses of more than 10k.

                  More worryingly the chancellor says he expects the IR to be aggressive in closing down any avoidance (evasion shirley?) schemes. Anyone want to bet there will be unintended and unforeseen consequences

                  Comment


                    #39
                    if its a one off tax - shirley they will pay the max allowed - 10 or 20k - then defer the rest of it for a bit and take it all later.

                    thats what i'd do anyway - but then I'm a capitalist pig-dog......

                    These are clever people - they will just avoid paying it

                    Comment


                      #40
                      From what I understand from listening to the radio this morning (admittedly it was a bit hazy, being the morning and all) the institution will have to declare the size of bonus pool, and the tax will be slapped on that.

                      Originally posted by jimjamuk View Post
                      if its a one off tax - shirley they will pay the max allowed - 10 or 20k - then defer the rest of it for a bit and take it all later.
                      Then the gov will just include it in the next budget?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X