• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Contractors are Thatchers children

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Scary View Post
    How can you have class mobility and a classless society?
    Try reading my post properly
    Coffee's for closers

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
      In my view the excesses of capitalism are represented more by the opportunism of recruitment agents and board level ruthlessness. The difference now is that these power excesses were exploited by the socialists and the Unions in a way that killed off enterprise. Today the same power is in different hands, but at least contractors are free (unless labour gets back in) to ply their trade, and the rest of us can create almost any business that we like.
      so, agents are Blair's babies?

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by Scary View Post
        Uh... this has never existed and never will, you cannot buy class. A toff who has lost everything is still upper class, and a working class lottery winner is still working class. Hyacinth Bucket, no matter how hard she tries, will not move from working/middle class to upper class.
        This depends upon your definition of class. I am not sure that your definition (by birth) is relevant. Class today is much more defined by wealth and aspiration. There is no longer much of a working class, many of who now are aspirational middle classes who want to own their own homes and enjoy choice about where they live, who they work for and holiday abroad. This group now includes plumbers, brickies and most blue collar workers. It is this mobility that is the crowning achievement of Thatcher despite labours efforts to put a stop to it through the education system (attack on Grammar schools) and the tax and welfare system (getting more people out of work and to become welfare dependent).

        Those who seek to vilify Thatcher "spin" the concept of personal responsibility and freedom into selfishness and greed. These people are uncomfortable at not having people who they can look down on and patronise with their empty "socialist" gestures which include:

        Voting labour
        Cclaiming to care about poor people
        Hating Thatcher
        Never challenging the public sector (polly Toynbee springs to mind)

        All gestures that dont involve any personal sacrifice.
        Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by thunderlizard View Post
          so, agents are Blair's babies?
          The worse insult we could be given is to be told that we are no better than Harriet Harperson
          Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
            gestures that dont involve any personal sacrifice.
            If socialists gave a stuff about poor people then a socialist government would be completely unnecessary to achieve their aim of helping the poor and downtrodden. If all lefties were to voluntarily give up between 10 and 20% (typical EU lower and higher social security contribution levels) of their income to provide for the poor through local charities then the poor would be helped more effectively and the rest of us wouldn't have to pay such huge taxes. It's because socialists lack the moral backbone to follow their words with actions that they force their ideology on others.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
              If socialists gave a stuff about poor people then a socialist government would be completely unnecessary to achieve their aim of helping the poor and downtrodden. If all lefties were to voluntarily give up between 10 and 20% (typical EU lower and higher social security contribution levels) of their income to provide for the poor through local charities then the poor would be helped more effectively and the rest of us wouldn't have to pay such huge taxes. It's because socialists lack the moral backbone to follow their words with actions that they force their ideology on others.
              Socialists generally want the poor and down trodden helped with someone elses money
              Coffee's for closers

              Comment


                #27
                Dodgy

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
                  Socialists generally want the poor and down trodden helped with someone elses money
                  Actually, I don't think they care a jot about the poor and down trodden beyond their usefulness as cannon fodder. The 'someone elses' money they want for themselves. They may publicly say something different, which is for the benefit of the proles they wish to use, but every such economy following socialist principles exhibit graft etc. etc..
                  Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                  threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by thunderlizard View Post
                    so, agents are Blair's babies?
                    Spawn of the Devil then?

                    It certainly seems apt for some.

                    (Not you Dodgy)

                    Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Most lefties are just folk from a middle class upbringing with a chip on their shoulder who promise people unacheivable things to get them on their side.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X