Originally posted by RichardCranium
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Just had the swine flu jag
Collapse
X
-
-
FFS.Originally posted by shoes View PostTamiflu typically reduces the length of the illness by up to one day providing it has been taken within a day of symptoms appearing. Not taking it doesn't make much difference.
You will probably get swine flu. If you do you will likely have a mild flu lasting a couple of days. You've probably already had it.
Having the jab definently exposes you to a risk. It might not even be effective.
Assuming the jab helps, the risk you take by not having it is of probably having an illness that will probably be mild for a couple of days.
No medicine is without risk or side effects. You take a risk either way.
And your medical degree came from?Comment
-
What are your qualifications?Originally posted by minestrone View PostFFS.
And your medical degree came from?Comment
-
Did you even read the link?Originally posted by minestrone View PostThe thread, as was started, was meant to be about the NHS reponding to the flu.Comment
-
Well, if the NHS is issuing Tamiflu that doesn't work, and since it first didn't work in an NHS hospital, it all seems pretty on-topic.Originally posted by minestrone View PostThe thread, as was started, was meant to be about the NHS reponding to the flu.My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.Comment
-
Originally posted by shoes View PostWhat are your qualifications?
I'm not the one issuing medical advice.Comment
-
So are you saying that the drug does not work? Why don't we email Roche that you are saying this on a public forum and see what their lawyers say.Originally posted by RichardCranium View PostWell, if the NHS is issuing Tamiflu that doesn't work, and since it first didn't work in an NHS hospital, it all seems pretty on-topic.Comment
-
I'm stating the obvious fact that there are risks associated both with having the jab and with not having the jab. Everyone should do their own research and reach their own decision. I know several professionals in the field who wouldn't go near it. Others disagree.Originally posted by minestrone View PostI'm not the one issuing medical advice.
You've done it now, If I were you I'd just try and forget about it.
ta taComment
-
I don't know what to believe. Conspiracy theorists harping on about the dangers of squalene adjuvants present in the vaccine and such like or the seemingly self interested power hungry ****s that run this country.
And on that basis count me out.
As for the nhs...its good in theory but certainly has some 'issues'.Comment
-
We can then point them at the BBC.Originally posted by minestrone View PostSo are you saying that the drug does not work? Why don't we email Roche that you are saying this on a public forum and see what their lawyers say.
And while we're knocking the NHS: "Three appear to have acquired the infection in hospital."
My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment