Originally posted by threaded
View Post
-
Well, the bloke wasn't a farmer, nor was he some kind of latter day folk hero standing up against council "oppression". You omitted to mention that he also shot a Policeman and a news reporter. In fact you could argue that it's because of twunts like him that the councils get too much power -
Not only that but according to the article Sergeant Blackie had been called off a course in Coxhoe and had to get to Consett. I don't know how far that is, but am pretty certain the gun would not have been smoking by the time he got there.Originally posted by bobhope View PostBehold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
-
The article does not say that. It merely states:Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
They could have been injured by the rush of everyone to get away, for all we can tell from that sentence. You don't need to be a journalist to know that if 3 people had been shot, the article would have explicitly said so.Harry Collinson had been shot dead as the cameras rolled and a policeman and television reporter were also injured.Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
-
I never siad the article did say that, however you are wrong, he did shoot the copper and the reporter and he is still inside for murder and attempted murder.Originally posted by Sysman View PostComment
-
Yadda yadda, the fact is the council official was being a smart arse. He especially invited the press to come along to make a media spectacle and humiliate the guy.
Those who've seen the video will agree that my version is accurate.Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
So the council guy was being an arse, and the acceptable response to that is summary execution? Are you mental or just trolling? You find the murder of a bloke (however arsey) and the attempted murder of the accompanying copper and a reporter funny - that's sick.Originally posted by threaded View Post
The guy (who wasn't a farmer) had bought some land even though he knew (or ought to have known) that he couldn't legally build anything on it. He asked the council if he could build on it and they said no, so he built on it anyway. After numerous warnings he was told to take it down, so he shot the council official and a copper and a reporter - and you think that's funny?
So the next time you get done for speeding are you planning to gun down the copper and have a laugh?Comment
-
Talk about bizarre extrapolation. Didn't say anything like that. When someone starts waving a gun about the normal response is to duck. Only an utter twit, who incidentally knew they were armed to the teeth, would then goad them. Come on, Darwin Award contenders generally are funny.Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostInsanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.Comment
-
Generally yes. Watching people get (really) murdered on telly isn't funny in my book, but fair play to you.Originally posted by threaded View PostComment
-
Sound totally reasonable and proportionate to me.council guy was being an arse, and the acceptable response to that is summary execution?bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
Seconded.Originally posted by zeitghostBehold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
Comment