• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Councils get ‘Al Capone’ power to seize assets over minor offences

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by threaded View Post
    How have I misrepresented it? That's what happened. I watched it on the TV news.
    Well, the bloke wasn't a farmer, nor was he some kind of latter day folk hero standing up against council "oppression". You omitted to mention that he also shot a Policeman and a news reporter. In fact you could argue that it's because of twunts like him that the councils get too much power

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by bobhope View Post
      Fantastic standards of journalism. Are they allowed to print nonsense like this?
      Not only that but according to the article Sergeant Blackie had been called off a course in Coxhoe and had to get to Consett. I don't know how far that is, but am pretty certain the gun would not have been smoking by the time he got there.
      Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
        You omitted to mention that he also shot a Policeman and a news reporter.
        The article does not say that. It merely states:

        Harry Collinson had been shot dead as the cameras rolled and a policeman and television reporter were also injured.
        They could have been injured by the rush of everyone to get away, for all we can tell from that sentence. You don't need to be a journalist to know that if 3 people had been shot, the article would have explicitly said so.
        Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by Sysman View Post
          The article does not say that. It merely states:

          They could have been injured by the rush of everyone to get away, for all we can tell from that sentence. You don't need to be a journalist to know that if 3 people had been shot, the article would have explicitly said so.
          I never siad the article did say that, however you are wrong, he did shoot the copper and the reporter and he is still inside for murder and attempted murder.

          Comment


            #25
            Yadda yadda, the fact is the council official was being a smart arse. He especially invited the press to come along to make a media spectacle and humiliate the guy.

            Those who've seen the video will agree that my version is accurate.
            Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
            threadeds website, and here's my blog.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by threaded View Post
              Yadda yadda, the fact is the council official was being a smart arse. He especially invited the press to come along to make a media spectacle and humiliate the guy.

              Those who've seen the video will agree that my version is accurate.
              So the council guy was being an arse, and the acceptable response to that is summary execution? Are you mental or just trolling? You find the murder of a bloke (however arsey) and the attempted murder of the accompanying copper and a reporter funny - that's sick.

              The guy (who wasn't a farmer) had bought some land even though he knew (or ought to have known) that he couldn't legally build anything on it. He asked the council if he could build on it and they said no, so he built on it anyway. After numerous warnings he was told to take it down, so he shot the council official and a copper and a reporter - and you think that's funny?

              So the next time you get done for speeding are you planning to gun down the copper and have a laugh?

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
                So the council guy was being an arse, and the acceptable response to that is summary execution? Are you mental or just trolling? You find the murder of a bloke (however arsey) and the attempted murder of the accompanying copper and a reporter funny - that's sick.

                The guy (who wasn't a farmer) had bought some land even though he knew (or ought to have known) that he couldn't legally build anything on it. He asked the council if he could build on it and they said no, so he built on it anyway. After numerous warnings he was told to take it down, so he shot the council official and a copper and a reporter - and you think that's funny?

                So the next time you get done for speeding are you planning to gun down the copper and have a laugh?
                Talk about bizarre extrapolation. Didn't say anything like that. When someone starts waving a gun about the normal response is to duck. Only an utter twit, who incidentally knew they were armed to the teeth, would then goad them. Come on, Darwin Award contenders generally are funny.
                Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by threaded View Post
                  Talk about bizarre extrapolation. Didn't say anything like that. When someone starts waving a gun about the normal response is to duck. Only an utter twit, who incidentally knew they were armed to the teeth, would then goad them. Come on, Darwin Award contenders generally are funny.
                  Generally yes. Watching people get (really) murdered on telly isn't funny in my book, but fair play to you.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    council guy was being an arse, and the acceptable response to that is summary execution?
                    Sound totally reasonable and proportionate to me.
                    bloggoth

                    If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
                    John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by zeitghost
                      Particularly for anyone in the planning dept.
                      Seconded.
                      Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X