Originally posted by Andy2
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Best way to refer to yourself in a CV
Collapse
X
-
-
Comment
-
There's always the 'Royal We' option.
e.g. as employed by M. Thatcher: -
"we are a grandmother"
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
Yeah, be consistent whichever route you choose. I take bogeyman's point but a company I took VR from employed Crapita to help prepare my CV and they took the same 3rd person line as BP. I've stuck to that.Originally posted by Andy2 View PostRefering to first person and third person will indicate multiple personality disorderComment
-
3rd person is functional but impersonal. IMO a CV should make you come across as a person, not a 'service'.Originally posted by TinTrump View PostYeah, be consistent whichever route you choose. I take bogeyman's point but a company I took VR from employed Crapita to help prepare my CV and they took the same 3rd person line as BP. I've stuck to that.
Might be ok for low-grade jobs but if it's a significant position, it's the person that counts.
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
I disagree. The impression I'd get reading a c.v. in the first person would either be of somebody a bit immature and inexperienced, or at the opposite end of the scale, somebody who is very self-centred.Originally posted by bogeyman View Post3rd person is functional but impersonal. IMO a CV should make you come across as a person, not a 'service'.
Might be ok for low-grade jobs but if it's a significant position, it's the person that counts.
It should be third person, as if you're reading a reference or review of the person. IMO.Will work inside IR35. Or for food.Comment
-
Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostI use
'The party of the first part'

Party, party, par
Oh. I see.
Sorry.
I don't mind, as long as there's a bed beneath the stars that shine. I'll be fine.
If you give me a minute, a man's got a limit, I can't get a life if my heart's not in it.Comment
-
I disagree. If you've ever read any CVs of top chaps (senior execs etc.) then they are invariably written in the first person - but well written - i.e. it doesn't read like: "I did this then I did that".Originally posted by VectraMan View PostI disagree. The impression I'd get reading a c.v. in the first person would either be of somebody a bit immature and inexperienced, or at the opposite end of the scale, somebody who is very self-centred.
It should be third person, as if you're reading a reference or review of the person. IMO.
Third person comes across as a mere functionary. It is only acceptable if the CV was prepared and offered by a third party.
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
I used to do that, but what with the coming of globalization, I now use a number of metrical variations strategically, for example often I will use inversion to highlight the key verb in a sentence.Originally posted by VectraMan View PostI try to use the iambic pentameter.
Notice how the phrasal structure increased in length as the sentence progressed, this induces a desire to meet me personally.
Whereas that sentence, with it's rhetorical question, produced a feeling of resolution and thereby no 'need'.
threaded in "spending too much time doing textual analysis on Agatha Christie novels" modeInsanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
I can see why you're such a hit with the ladies, old boy.Originally posted by threaded View PostNotice how the phrasal structure increased in length as the sentence progressed, this induces a desire to meet me personally.
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment