• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Best way to refer to yourself in a CV

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Andy2 View Post
    Refering to first person and third person will indicate multiple personality disorder
    why do you think I chose this avitar?

    Comment


      #12
      I try to use the iambic pentameter.
      Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

      Comment


        #13
        There's always the 'Royal We' option.

        e.g. as employed by M. Thatcher: -

        "we are a grandmother"

        You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Andy2 View Post
          Refering to first person and third person will indicate multiple personality disorder
          Yeah, be consistent whichever route you choose. I take bogeyman's point but a company I took VR from employed Crapita to help prepare my CV and they took the same 3rd person line as BP. I've stuck to that.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by TinTrump View Post
            Yeah, be consistent whichever route you choose. I take bogeyman's point but a company I took VR from employed Crapita to help prepare my CV and they took the same 3rd person line as BP. I've stuck to that.
            3rd person is functional but impersonal. IMO a CV should make you come across as a person, not a 'service'.

            Might be ok for low-grade jobs but if it's a significant position, it's the person that counts.

            You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by bogeyman View Post
              3rd person is functional but impersonal. IMO a CV should make you come across as a person, not a 'service'.

              Might be ok for low-grade jobs but if it's a significant position, it's the person that counts.
              I disagree. The impression I'd get reading a c.v. in the first person would either be of somebody a bit immature and inexperienced, or at the opposite end of the scale, somebody who is very self-centred.

              It should be third person, as if you're reading a reference or review of the person. IMO.
              Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
                I use

                'The party of the first part'



                Party, party, par

                Oh. I see.

                Sorry.
                I don't mind, as long as there's a bed beneath the stars that shine. I'll be fine.
                If you give me a minute, a man's got a limit, I can't get a life if my heart's not in it.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
                  I disagree. The impression I'd get reading a c.v. in the first person would either be of somebody a bit immature and inexperienced, or at the opposite end of the scale, somebody who is very self-centred.

                  It should be third person, as if you're reading a reference or review of the person. IMO.
                  I disagree. If you've ever read any CVs of top chaps (senior execs etc.) then they are invariably written in the first person - but well written - i.e. it doesn't read like: "I did this then I did that".

                  Third person comes across as a mere functionary. It is only acceptable if the CV was prepared and offered by a third party.

                  You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
                    I try to use the iambic pentameter.
                    I used to do that, but what with the coming of globalization, I now use a number of metrical variations strategically, for example often I will use inversion to highlight the key verb in a sentence.

                    Notice how the phrasal structure increased in length as the sentence progressed, this induces a desire to meet me personally.

                    Whereas that sentence, with it's rhetorical question, produced a feeling of resolution and thereby no 'need'.

                    threaded in "spending too much time doing textual analysis on Agatha Christie novels" mode
                    Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                    threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by threaded View Post
                      Notice how the phrasal structure increased in length as the sentence progressed, this induces a desire to meet me personally.
                      I can see why you're such a hit with the ladies, old boy.

                      You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X