Stumbled across this and, initially, couldn't believe it but hey, we're all just a number, right?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Dead peasants insurance
Collapse
X
-
-
How come when your employer takes out a policy on you it's "wishing you were dead" but if it's your wife then you don't (normally) expect to find razor blades in your packed lunch?
Why shouldn't a company insure their most valuable assets... having to replace/train a key person could cost many £thousands, and losing someone critical to a project at the wrong time could end up much more expensive.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishing -
That's what it was originally intended for, but due to tax breaks companies figured out it was financially beneficial to insure every single employee and cash in if any died.Originally posted by d000hg View PostHow come when your employer takes out a policy on you it's "wishing you were dead" but if it's your wife then you don't (normally) expect to find razor blades in your packed lunch?
Why shouldn't a company insure their most valuable assets... having to replace/train a key person could cost many £thousands, and losing someone critical to a project at the wrong time could end up much more expensive.Comment
-
-
Once again, you've missed the points.Originally posted by d000hg View PostHow come when your employer takes out a policy on you it's "wishing you were dead" but if it's your wife then you don't (normally) expect to find razor blades in your packed lunch?
Why shouldn't a company insure their most valuable assets... having to replace/train a key person could cost many £thousands, and losing someone critical to a project at the wrong time could end up much more expensive.
Companies were doing this for non-valuable employees.
Companies were continuing to do this for ex-employees.
Companies were not obtaining permission from the employees beforehand.Comment
-
I listened to the first couple of minutes and they didn't mention those things, maybe you should have summarised before-hand rather than expect us to watch the whole video if you wanted an informed discussion?Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Yet you felt the need to comment anyway.Originally posted by d000hg View PostI listened to the first couple of minutes and they didn't mention those things, maybe you should have summarised before-hand rather than expect us to watch the whole video if you wanted an informed discussion?
Last edited by Clippy; 4 October 2009, 18:05.Comment
-
What are you talking about? You don't want us to be informed to comment but then you complain if we make uninformed comments? Too many beers with your Sunday dinner?Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Comment
-
I'm not sure, I only skimmed your posts before replying.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Today 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29


Comment