• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Roman Polanski arrested in Switzerland over sex with underage girl

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by Clippy View Post
    Agreed.

    He'll get off though.
    As predicted, although he didn't 'get off', the little weasel gets to keep his liberty because the spineless clock makers refused to extradite him.

    Gary Glitter must be fuming!

    The Swiss government declared Polanski a free man on Monday after rejecting the US extradition request.

    The Swiss said US authorities failed to provide confidential testimony about Polanski's original sentencing procedure.

    The Justice Ministry also said that national interests were taken into consideration in the decision.
    Interesting, I wonder what Swiss national interests would benefit from having this pedo at large.

    Comment


      #42
      RP

      Originally posted by Clippy View Post
      As predicted, although he didn't 'get off', the little weasel gets to keep his liberty because the spineless clock makers refused to extradite him.

      Gary Glitter must be fuming!



      Interesting, I wonder what Swiss national interests would benefit from having this pedo at large.

      I think a few million "national interests" would have done it.
      There are no evil thoughts except one: the refusal to think

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by Clippy View Post
        Agreed.

        He'll get off though.
        The question though is more complex: get off what exactly?

        He was sentenced and served his sentence.

        The judge then changed his mind and tried to up the sentence, but he'd already left the country after serving his original term.

        Which is basically why the Swiss have released him: he's already served his time.
        Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
        threadeds website, and here's my blog.

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by threaded View Post
          The question though is more complex: get off what exactly?

          He was sentenced and served his sentence.

          The judge then changed his mind and tried to up the sentence, but he'd already left the country after serving his original term.

          Which is basically why the Swiss have released him: he's already served his time.
          Not correct. He was remanded in custody (or whatever the US equivalent is) for the purpose of a pre-sentencing psychiatric evaluation, spending forty-two days there. He was then released on bail pending a hearing at which sentence would be passed but fled the country before that hearing.

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
            Not correct. He was remanded in custody (or whatever the US equivalent is) for the purpose of a pre-sentencing psychiatric evaluation, spending forty-two days there. He was then released on bail pending a hearing at which sentence would be passed but fled the country before that hearing.
            Nah, that is the crux of the story: the Swiss court wanted to see the paperwork from the American court where this version of events is given, but the yanks won't, 'cause it probably doesn't exist. The Swiss decided therefore to go with Polanski's copies of the paperwork from the American court that show he has already served his time.
            Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
            threadeds website, and here's my blog.

            Comment


              #46
              The prurient hounding of Roman Polanski is over at last | Agnes Poirier | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk

              The question today is really this: how did we get to this Kafka-esque situation whereby a man who had already served time in prison for a crime he admitted committing suddenly finds himself arrested again by overzealous authorities in a foreign land, sent to prison, then confined to house arrest for nine months, 33 years after the facts? "But he fled justice!" Polanski's detractors would reply. As admirably shown in the rigorous documentary made in 2008 by American director Marina Zenovich – Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired – in 1978, Roman Polanski simply had the guts to flee the iniquitous justice of the Los Angeles court and celebrity-obsessed Judge Rittenband, whose gross misconduct is today officially acknowledged by all.

              Polanski never claimed not to have had unlawful sexual intercourse with the 13-year-old Samantha Geimer. He indeed pleaded guilty. He also came back from Europe to be assessed by psychiatrists and serve a 90-day sentence in prison agreed by all parties. He only fled when he discovered that the judge wanted to go back on his word.
              "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

              Comment

              Working...
              X