• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Voting intentions at next General Election poll

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    Same here. Complete waste of time voting.
    No doubt the result is coming out the same way because too many people think along the same lines.

    If the turn out was higher then I would not be surprised to see a swing.
    Last edited by dx4100; 17 August 2009, 15:47.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by TinTrump View Post
      Which is why NuLabour rashly changed postal voting rules, believing it would increase their number of votes, without sufficient checks. The result being electoral fraud, especially in parts of Brum. Appalling hijinks including postal vote "factories" and houses with supposed occupants numbered in double figures.
      I'd still prefer they keep trying to get turnout up.
      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
      Originally posted by vetran
      Urine is quite nourishing

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by d000hg View Post
        I'd still prefer they keep trying to get turnout up.
        Why do people think more people should vote?

        They should make voting a test with several questions on policies etc., and if you can't match the party's policies with the party, your vote doesn't count.

        That way only the people that have thought about it influence the result.
        Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
          Why do people think more people should vote?

          They should make voting a test with several questions on policies etc., and if you can't match the party's policies with the party, your vote doesn't count.

          That way only the people that have thought about it influence the result.
          But that works off the principle that parties aren't all a bunch of lying bastards in the first instance

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by dx4100 View Post
            But that works off the principle that parties aren't all a bunch of lying bastards in the first instance
            Yes, but if you're going to base your voting system on the fact that the parties are all a bunch of lying bastards, then there really is no point voting, or even holding an election.

            Just let Brown and Cameron take turns.
            Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
              Yes, but if you're going to base your voting system on the fact that the parties are all a bunch of lying bastards, then there really is no point voting, or even holding an election.

              Just let Brown and Cameron take turns.
              And that's how it has worked for decades.

              Voting is pointless.
              My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.

              Comment


                #37
                Come on! Which of you barstewards ticked Labour?
                bloggoth

                If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
                John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
                  Why do people think more people should vote?

                  They should make voting a test with several questions on policies etc., and if you can't match the party's policies with the party, your vote doesn't count.

                  That way only the people that have thought about it influence the result.
                  Our current system is based on the core principle that every person is as important as every other. You might not like that system, but while we have it people should probably be encouraged to vote.
                  Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                  I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                  Originally posted by vetran
                  Urine is quite nourishing

                  Comment


                    #39
                    UK Libertarian Party

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by Addanc View Post
                      Goodness me, I'm 90% liberal.
                      ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X