• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Couple lose despite backing every greyhound

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    That would require a 14 million pound spend to guarantee 1 win.
    On the UK lottery it would, these syndicates are global.

    If a state lotto has rolled over to say $100m and it only cost $14m to enter a guaranteed win a betting man would have a punt and the cost is spread over thousands of investors.

    Don't forget the syndicate will also pick up every other prize available including all combinations of bonus ball prizes.
    Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
      That would require a 14 million pound spend to guarantee 1 win.
      It worked on the Irish lottery a few years back. There were only 2 million-odd combinations - and after a succession of rollovers, the likelihood was that the jackpot would be more than the outlay, even if the jackpot was shared.

      A syndicate bought about 80% of the combinations (the lottery provider tried to stop them by shutting down terminals).

      In the end, they made aout £310K out of an outlay of about 800K. The would have made more if the jackpot had not been shared.

      Bet they were sh!**ing themselves because they only had 80% of the tickets.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
        On the UK lottery it would, these syndicates are global.

        If a state lotto has rolled over to say $100m and it only cost $14m to enter a guaranteed win a betting man would have a punt and the cost is spread over thousands of investors.

        Don't forget the syndicate will also pick up every other prize available including all combinations of bonus ball prizes.
        I think the UK lottery rules bar people from taking actions that significantly affect the outcome. So while buying more than one ticket is okay, if you do manage to buy every ticket, Camelot could refuse to pay out.

        Not sure how this would stand up in court, but the possibility of non-payout is probably enough to scare syndicates off.

        There's also the logistical matter of buying 14 million tickets in a short period. Possible with 2 million, but it becomes exponetially harder with more combinations

        Comment


          #14
          One of the jackpot winners was a local punter who also wished to remain anonymous and the other an internet gambler known as the Scoop6 Squirrel.
          Nah, couldn't be. Could it?
          How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

          Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
          Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

          "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
            Nah, couldn't be. Could it?
            I was wondering the same thing
            I'm sorry, but I'll make no apologies for this

            Pogle is awarded +5 Xeno Geek Points.
            CUK University Challenge Champions 2010
            CUK University Challenge Champions 2012

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
              That would require a 14 million pound spend to guarantee 1 win.
              Yes, but you get a lot 4 & 5 number combos as well. That dilutes the amount of other folk claiming.
              ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
                That would require a 14 million pound spend to guarantee 1 win.
                And it did happen in the national lottery once on a triple rollover.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by centurian View Post

                  There's also the logistical matter of buying 14 million tickets in a short period. Possible with 2 million, but it becomes exponetially harder with more combinations
                  I should think the logistics of buying 2 million tickets would be hard enough. Can you imagine what a queue you'd cause at the post office

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by KentPhilip View Post
                    I should think the logistics of buying 2 million tickets would be hard enough. Can you imagine what a queue you'd cause at the post office
                    I recall a programme a few years ago about one of the US states lotteries that had rolled over a load of times. Some syndicate put together a large team of people who went to every lottery sales point in the state to buy up all of the numbers.
                    If memory serves they had over 100 people and they only just managed to get the tickets bought between the time that the terminals opened and the draw, mind you they had something like $100 mil jackpot at stake and had to manage it on the QT as there was some law against buying all the numbers.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
                      I recall a programme a few years ago about one of the US states lotteries that had rolled over a load of times. Some syndicate put together a large team of people who went to every lottery sales point in the state to buy up all of the numbers.
                      If memory serves they had over 100 people and they only just managed to get the tickets bought between the time that the terminals opened and the draw, mind you they had something like $100 mil jackpot at stake and had to manage it on the QT as there was some law against buying all the numbers.
                      did they win?
                      I'm sorry, but I'll make no apologies for this

                      Pogle is awarded +5 Xeno Geek Points.
                      CUK University Challenge Champions 2010
                      CUK University Challenge Champions 2012

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X