How Many People Are In This Range?

[NickFitz]

£300 - £500

Hardly a small step-size in this poll.

WHS - aren't most people in this range already?

Perhaps we should have a poll to see.

Well?

[Menelaus]

If I might offer an opinion, would it be better to offer choices including greater than and less than (together with the mandatory AndyW option)?

[RichardCranium]

I'm on the bench, so is my current rate £0 ?

[NickFitz]

If I might offer an opinion, would it be better to offer choices including greater than and less than (together with the mandatory AndyW option)?

That wasn't in the original specification. You'll have to justify this modification and explain where the budget is coming from; we don't want to fall prey to feature creep

[RichardCranium]

we don't want to fall prey to feature creep

We already have.

The original specification called for "getting out of bed rates".

This has evolved into "your current rate".

The answers to the original specified question is most unlikely to be the same as the current question.


(spot the pain in the arse PM who actually uses product based planning and tracks change)

[NickFitz]

We already have.

The original specification called for "getting out of bed rates".

This has evolved into "your current rate".

The answers to the original specified question is most unlikely to be the same as the current question.


(spot the pain in the arse PM who actually uses product based planning and tracks change)

This poll is responding to MPWDI's question "Aren't most people in this range already" (where "already" implies their current rate) and your admirable response thereto suggesting a poll.

Therefore the poll is to spec for the question being addressed, although that is not the original question in the thread that led to its creation.

[RichardCranium]

This poll is responding to MPWDI's question "Aren't most people in this range already" (where "already" implies their current rate) and your admirable response thereto suggesting a poll.

Therefore the poll is to spec for the question being addressed, although that is not the original question in the thread that led to its creation.

You slippery bugger!


You know, I reckon I'd love working with you.

[Zippy]

You slippery bugger!


You know, I reckon I'd love working with you.

NickFitz is a pimp?

[NickFitz]

You slippery bugger!


You know, I reckon I'd love working with you.

[RichardCranium]

NickFitz is a pimp?

'with', not 'for'. I only work for the Missus or the bank. Or the taxman, I suppose.