Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I was thinking while on the bog
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by RichardCranium View PostSo when you see mindless damage, don't think "Why do they do this?", think "Why do they feel this is the only form of expression available to them?"
What else is there for them to do?
The Victorians built free lidos; we now charge for them. They built parks and gardens; we no longer maintain them. They subsidised the arts and music; we merely pay £50m for the odd picture "to stay in the country". They provided museums and galleries; we charge for them. They encouraged youth groups; we call their leaders kiddy-fiddlers. They encouraged social discourse; we are headed toward two-party politics. Global travel was remarkably cheap and borders were open; now we have border controls. Sports and games were encouraged; now roads are built without thought to pedestrians. The mines and factories provided social clubs, musical instruments, time off to enter band competitions, debating societies; now there is - what? Bugger all to do except break things in the only room that doesn't have a camera pointing at you all day long.Comment
-
Slightly skewed representation of Victorian Britain. Much as I appreciate the buildings we inherited from them, if I was to perform a critique I'd point out:- There wasn't universal suffrage
- It was a 2 party system (mainly for the landed class and, later in the 19th C, business interests) with corrupt practices (rotten/pottwalloper boroughs etc)
- Victorian London was rife with violent crime and prostitution hence reformers like Bentham, Cadbury buildling his model village for workers (not of chocolate, alas)
- Life expectancy was lower, by about 20 years for a man (about 77 now, maybe 55 then)
- Appalling conditions in factories and mines (no need for the workers to add to the misery by sabotaging toilets)
- No free education system after about the age of 10 (but provision for the wealthy)
Of course since 1979 we've insisted upon voting in the same party for extended periods until they've not a clever, benevolent idea left in their heads but become ever more desperate to hold onto power enacting spiteful legislation and trying to scare us into signing away our freedoms.
End of soapbox moment.Comment
-
Originally posted by MPwannadecentincome View PostDunno - but reminds me of the joke - "Who is Armitage and what is Shanking"?
HTHScience isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostWhy are Armitage Shanks still in business?"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Originally posted by RichardCranium View PostBored, disgruntled employees who feel they could be doing more with their lives than the pointless drudgery of which their existence consists under the perpetual pestering of rubbish management for the enrichment of ungrateful owners or unknown shareholders, made all the worse by having to work in the presence of smug, overpaid contractors.
It's because work is crap but one is not allowed to say so; this causes internal conflict which comes out as sickness, mental illness, domestic violence, self-harm, drug abuse, alcoholism and vandalism.
When such unhappy people are in an environment where they are listened to and can make a difference, their behaviour will be entirely different.
Sadly, we are in a society that, by use of surveillance cameras, means that unhappy people become criminals: rather than fixing the real problem we are causing a far worse one.
The answer to petty crime is not entrapment and stronger punishment; it is to remove the motivation.
So, what sort of twit that does such things? The unhappy, under-occupied, under-stimulated sort. Just normal people in tedious environments; caged animals that self-harm by damaging the environment around them just to pass the time of day. Just to prove to themselves that they can actually do something, that they exist, that they can influence the world around them; sadly all they are permitted to do is break the rules.
So they do. Sometimes it's that or kill yourself or harm someone you love.
So when you see mindless damage, don't think "Why do they do this?", think "Why do they feel this is the only form of expression available to them?"
What else is there for them to do?
The Victorians built free lidos; we now charge for them. They built parks and gardens; we no longer maintain them. They subsidised the arts and music; we merely pay £50m for the odd picture "to stay in the country". They provided museums and galleries; we charge for them. They encouraged youth groups; we call their leaders kiddy-fiddlers. They encouraged social discourse; we are headed toward two-party politics. Global travel was remarkably cheap and borders were open; now we have border controls. Sports and games were encouraged; now roads are built without thought to pedestrians. The mines and factories provided social clubs, musical instruments, time off to enter band competitions, debating societies; now there is - what? Bugger all to do except break things in the only room that doesn't have a camera pointing at you all day long.
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TinTrump View Post.. Of course since 1979 we've insisted upon voting in the same party for extended periods until they've not a clever, benevolent idea left in their heads but become ever more desperate to hold onto power enacting spiteful legislation and trying to scare us into signing away our freedoms.
End of soapbox moment.Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post"Going for an Armitage" was a common cock-a-knee phrase before Jodrell Bank was built.
HTH
Lower down was a site with a list of cockney rhyming slang - Cockney Rhyming Slang - ok I get this now!This default font is sooooooooooooo boring and so are short usernamesComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment