• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

The Mayor of Doncaster

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by leeperry View Post
    I am, you're the idiot who started with the stupid point scoring when he couldn't hack it and I look like a fool?
    You think 11.75% is a mandate?. You're an idiot.
    Answer his question. Let's try to make it even more simple for you. If 100% of the electorate vote, and one person gets 11.75% of the vote and the other 88.25% of the vote is spread evenly between say, 10 people, so each gets 8.825% of the vote.....by your "logic" the guy that gets 11.75% of the vote wouldn't have a mandate because more people voted for other candidates.

    You are that dumb I am amazed you ever learned to breath.
    Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus

    Comment


      Originally posted by PM-Junkie View Post
      Answer his question. Let's try to make it even more simple for you. If 100% of the electorate vote, and one person gets 11.75% of the vote and the other 88.25% of the vote is spread evenly between say, 10 people, so each gets 8.825% of the vote.....by your "logic" the guy that gets 11.75% of the vote wouldn't have a mandate because more people voted for other candidates.
      The fact that you have to dream up these imaginary scenarios instead of discussing what actually happened in this case says it all about your argument.

      Originally posted by PM-Junkie View Post
      You are that dumb I am amazed you ever learned to breath.
      It's breathe you moron.

      Comment


        Well, here I am in Sunny Doncaster. As soon as I got off the plane I got that whiff of good old England, y'know that eau d'backed-up toilet mixed with a hint of stale curry, and thought to myself that I should keep smiling, it's a 'holiday'.

        threaded in "holiday in Cambodia" mode
        Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
        threadeds website, and here's my blog.

        Comment


          Originally posted by leeperry View Post
          The fact that you have to dream up these imaginary scenarios instead of discussing what actually happened in this case says it all about your argument.

          It's breathe you moron.
          You are clearly a troll. Nobody can be this dumb.
          Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus

          Comment


            Originally posted by PM-Junkie View Post
            Nobody can be this dumb.
            This thread is reinforcing my opinions on pm's and agents.


            You are that dumb I am amazed you ever learned to breath.
            You couldn't make it up.

            Comment


              Originally posted by leeperry View Post
              This thread is reinforcing my opinions on pm's and agents.



              You couldn't make it up.
              Not rising to the bait any more, sorry. As trolls go, you are pretty pathetic.
              Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus

              Comment


                If you choose not to vote, then complain at the result, you are too thick to be allowed to vote in the first place.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by leeperry View Post
                  Yeah, on a piss taking thread, Get a grip

                  I never said he should be not allowed to do anything I said with a turnout that low you cannot say he has a mandate, that's all.
                  A low turnout isn't at all uncommon in all UK elections be they Parliamentary, Local, EU or Mayoral, in first past the post (excluding EU and Devolved obviously) systems it's not unusual to get 40% of the vote and be a clear winner when only 40% of the electorate voted. That's 16% of the actual electorate.
                  It's far from unusual for a Westminster parliamentary government to be elected with a sizable majority with a similar mandate. I certainly don't see the new Mayor of Doncaster as lacking a mandate as he was properly elected under our current fptp excuse for a democracy.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X