Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The Tories were just the same. It has nothing to do with socialism.
It's because those who make the rules, make the rules to suit themselves.
Aye. They have said nothing about this.
Plod should investigate MP's.
How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.
They might catch one person, but their IT systems are like a flipping sieve. So the leaks will continue. If you know were to look you can essentially 'google' the stuff up. The only reason it wasn't in the papers years ago is that it wasn't 'interesting' to the journos.
The thing I find most amusing in all of this is that the government bring in legislation like IR35, force their IT contractors to take IR35 unfriendly contracts (or leave), and then are truly surprised when embarrassments like this occur.
They really are that thick!
You're governed by twonks, utter bunch of twonks.
The day IR35 came in, the stock exchange systems crashed.
Funny ol' thing eh?
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus
The Tories were just the same. It has nothing to do with socialism.
It's because those who make the rules, make the rules to suit themselves.
Time will tell, but I am not sure that you are correct there. The Tories generally are a wealthier bunch so do not need to fiddle expenses to feather their nests. Certainly, the Tory shadow cabinet will have to have gone a long way to outdo the Labour cabinet on expenses sleaze. Labour, remember, are also supposed to be 'whiter than white' as per Blair's triumphal speech of 1997.
The whole episode is no more than a metaphor for the very concept of giving people money with no accountability. When money is poured into public services, the leaders help themselves to the first tranche. The next lot is doled out to managers (who promise to vote labour, or who are owed favours by the govt)and then eventually what is left is spent on delivering a "service" to the public.
MP's claims that their expenses are "within the rules" contrast sharply with their claims that people should pay a "fair" amount of tax - even if those people operate inside "the rules".
Time will tell, but I am not sure that you are correct there. The Tories generally are a wealthier bunch so do not need to fiddle expenses to feather their nests. Certainly, the Tory shadow cabinet will have to have gone a long way to outdo the Labour cabinet on expenses sleaze. Labour, remember, are also supposed to be 'whiter than white' as per Blair's triumphal speech of 1997.
Ahmmm... 'cash for questions'?? Just sleaze by a different name.
At this rate I may be persuaded to vote liberal at least some of their MP’s appear to have a modicum of moral fibre.
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson
What gets me is when you look at how ridiculous some of the claims are, and the standard response is "it's all within the rules"...
What about the rules of having good morals and not living off the back of other people's hard work? They should be sacked, forced to pay it back plus interest, or jailed.
The cycle of life: born > learn > work > learn > dead.
Comment