Originally posted by EternalOptimist
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Not bad Obama!
Collapse
X
-
-
damn that wolf. gazumped againOriginally posted by TimberWolf View PostI thought it was Germany that declared war on the USA, after Pearl Harbour.
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
IIRC America declared war on Germany shortly after Germany declared war on America because America had declared war on Japan. Yet one should remember that at the time Germany accused America of waging war on them since 1937.Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostOut of interest, could you please remind me the date when the USA declared war on Germany (presumably because of Versailles)
Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
We've covered that many times over....The man paid the unltimate price of Police incompetence..lets leave it at that.Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostYou mean a Brazilian electrician that was in the country illegally? A fact that often gets missed.McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."Comment
-
Originally posted by PM-Junkie View PostActually, you could argue that had the USA not moved their fleet HQ from San Diego to Pearl Harbour, the USA/Japan bit of WW2 would never have happened. The Pearl Harbour attack wouldn't have happened in San Diego because the surprise element wouldn't have been there, and wherever else in the Pacific Rim the Japanese attacked they knew the the US Pacific Fleet would be too much of a threat...so if they couldn't knock out the US Pacific Fleet a la Pearl Harbour, would they have started a fight?
That is a very good question. The Japs did have another real strategic option.
Instead of attacking the USA as a means to securing the oil. Stop the big fleet movements, concentrate even more forces to defeat China. After China , pick up the Pacific pieces left of the British empire after Adolf has UBoated them into oblivion.
If the Brits are still hanging on, mobilise a part of the fleet against them, leaving the USA with one big dilemma.
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
One of the sticking points in the Versailles treaty was about free movement of ships at sea. Britain didn't like it, but the yanks did.Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostThat is a very good question. The Japs did have another real strategic option.
Instead of attacking the USA as a means to securing the oil. Stop the big fleet movements, concentrate even more forces to defeat China. After China , pick up the Pacific pieces left of the British empire after Adolf has UBoated them into oblivion.
If the Brits are still hanging on, mobilise a part of the fleet against them, leaving the USA with one big dilemma.

Comes back to the Versailles treaty whichever way you want to look at it.
Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
It still didn't pass Shaunbhoy denial of basic human rights.Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View PostWe've covered that many times over....The man paid the unltimate price of Police incompetence..lets leave it at that.
I've seen much of the rest of the world. It is brutal and cruel and dark, Rome is the light.Comment
-
Totally agree. I'm at BT and the contractors have been cut to the bare bones and replaced with cheap labour that can't do the job properly but the bean counters at the top are loving it (until they actually need to deliver something to the client then the tulip hits the fan)Originally posted by Liability View PostNice little opener - obv the Indians arent happy
Cost Advantage to India? LOL What about the cost incurred to manage the disaster they create!
Now if only we had a gutsy Prime Minister who could tax those companies in the UK for offshoring.
Anti competition? Sod that! Its about looking after your tax payers!Blood in your pooComment
-
Originally posted by Sausage Surprise View PostTotally agree. I'm at BT and the contractors have been cut to the bare bones and replaced with cheap labour that can't do the job properly but the bean counters at the top are loving it (until they actually need to deliver something to the client then the tulip hits the fan)
This thread is about Hitler
Comment
-
"Not Bad Obama" - Yeah close enough.Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
This thread is about HitlerHow did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.
Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - AesopComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Jan 7 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Today 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Yesterday 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48

Comment