Male perspective required

[Pogle]

only you lot could turn a perfectly acceptable smutty thread into binary data tables!!

I for one, am impressed - geekery will out

[Mich the Tester]

Version 2.0

Spacing might confuse things but that's out of my control

M1= Self
M2= other bloke
W1= Mrs Tester
W2= Kim Wilde
W3= Anne Widdecombe

M1M2W1W2W3OK
1 0 1 0 0 1
1 1 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 1 0
1 0 1 1 0 1
0 1 1 0 0 somebody dies
1 0 0 0 0 AndyW

[TimberWolf]

I could write an Elementary Equation Test for this.

M=Man
W=Woman

M M W W OK
1 0 1 1 1
1 0 0 1 1
1 1 0 0 0
1 0 1 0 0
1 1 1 0 0
1 0 0 0 AndyW

Sorry about the spacing but you get the idea

M	M	W	W	OK
1	0	1	1	1
1	0	0	1	1
1	1	0	0	0
1	0	1	0	0
1	1	1	0	0
1	0	0	0	AndyW

Let's cover all cases:

M	M	W	W	OK
0	0	0	0	1 :ind
0	0	0	1	1 
0	0	1	0	1
0	0	1	1	1 :rolleyes:
0	1	0	0	0 :emb
0	1	0	1	1
0	1	1	0	1 
0	1	1	1	1 :banana:
1	0	0	0	0 :emb
1	0	0	1	1
1	0	1	0	1
1	0	1	1	0 :banana:
1	1	0	0	0 :sick
1	1	0	1	0 
1	1	1	0	0
1	1	1	1	1

[Bear]

Version 2.0

Spacing might confuse things but that's out of my control

M1= Self
M2= other bloke
W1= Mrs Tester
W2= Kim Wilde
W3= Anne Widdecombe

M1M2W1W2W3OK
1 0 1 0 0 1
1 1 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 1 0
1 0 1 1 0 1
0 1 1 0 0 somebody dies
1 0 0 0 0 AndyW

I'm impressed by your loyality to MrsTester!! No case for just you and Kim Wilde then?

[Rookie]

Version 2.0

Spacing might confuse things but that's out of my control

M1= Self
M2= other bloke
W1= Mrs Tester
W2= Kim Wilde
W3= Anne Widdecombe

M1M2W1W2W3OK
1 0 1 0 0 1
1 1 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 1 0
1 0 1 1 0 1
0 1 1 0 0 somebody dies
1 0 0 0 0 AndyW

Kim Wilde? Where are you based Mitch? The ******* 80's?!?!?!

[Pogle]

She's a gardner now

[Rookie]

She's a gardner now

I thought that was Alan TitsMarch

[TimberWolf]

Version 2.0

Spacing might confuse things but that's out of my control

M1= Self
M2= other bloke
W1= Mrs Tester
W2= Kim Wilde
W3= Anne Widdecombe

M1     M2      W1      W2      W3      OK
1	0	1	0	0	1
1	1	0	0	0	0
1	0	0	0	1	0
1	0	1	1	0	1
0	1	1	0	0	somebody dies
1	0	0	0	0	AndyW

Hmm, version 2.0 has been enhanced to include 3 women

[Menelaus]

[/CODE]

Hmm, version 2.0 has been enhanced to include 3 women

you say that like it's a bad thing?

[Mich the Tester]

M	M	W	W	OK
1	0	1	1	1
1	0	0	1	1
1	1	0	0	0
1	0	1	0	0
1	1	1	0	0
1	0	0	0	AndyW

Let's cover all cases:

M	M	W	W	OK
0	0	0	0	1 :ind
0	0	0	1	1 
0	0	1	0	1
0	0	1	1	1 :rolleyes:
0	1	0	0	0 :emb
0	1	0	1	1
0	1	1	0	1 
0	1	1	1	1 :banana:
1	0	0	0	0 :emb
1	0	0	1	1
1	0	1	0	1
1	0	1	1	0 :banana:
1	1	0	0	0 :sick
1	1	0	1	0 
1	1	1	0	0
1	1	1	1	1

You don't need to test all variations. You need to cover all the relevant determinants in an equation at least once. That's the point of elementary equation testing; minimize the number of test cases while achieving good coverage. A test case involving M2 covers all options involving M2 as M2 is the prime determinant of OK 1/0. Same applies to Anne Widdecombe. If she's around, not even Mrs Tester and Kim Wilde will get me going.