Don't mention this to the Wife or GF

[cailin maith]

It's a bit sad that dogmatic people try to knobble potentially life saving treatments.

Smallpox was eliminated from the population by a huge vaccination campaign, many other serious and debilitating conditions have been hugely suppressed, I can't see a valid reason for people to object to HPV vaccinations. Personally I'd support them being given to all children and adults irrespective of gender.

Same here... regardless of gender or religion for that matter. If it saves lives then it should be done.

[Pickle2]

Don't mention this to the Wife or GF

And especially not to both.

[NotAllThere]

Its overrated anyways.
A BJ makes your day but anal sex makes your whole week

Giving or receiving?

Personally, I've got "exit only" tattooed on my arse!

Whoooshhh!

Old news though: Last updated - Thursday, 10 May 2007, 07:40 GMT 08:40 UK

I knew some religious types who allowed their daughter to have it at age 13, on the basis that she might "fall away" in future. But they're the type who think that religious belief is something you work out for youself. Parents can guide, but ultimately, it has to be the kids choice or it ain't worf nuffink.

[Pickle2]

Whoooshhh!
I knew some religious types who allowed their daughter to have it at age 13, on the basis that she might "fall away" in future. But they're the type who think that religious belief is something you work out for youself. Parents can guide, but ultimately, it has to be the kids choice or it ain't worf nuffink.

If having previously read the first post, you then later jump straight to the end, this sounds really quite odd.

[Ruprect]

If having previously read the first post, you then later jump straight to the end, this sounds really quite odd.

You're the one talking about jumping straight to the end

[EternalOptimist]

[QUOTE=NotAllThere;816462]Whoooshhh!

QUOTE]

I am wasted here

[Badger]

Its overrated anyways.
A BJ makes your day but anal sex makes your whole week

[ASB]

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/82/25...59ea341c75.jpg

[SizeZero]

I can't see a valid reason for people to object to HPV vaccinations.

The test group for the vaccine trials was 16 - 24 year old females. In their wisdom, someone decided that the vaccine should be routinely given to girls of 13 (pre-puberty in many cases).

Reports coming from the test-nation of everything medical, the USA, have some very disturbing results, from headaches and blisters, to seizures, paralysis and death. I'd say that's a valid reason to object to putting your daughter forward as an unpaid guineapig; my own will be eligible very shortly but she won't be having it until there's been far more independent testing, or until she's old enough to decide for herself.

[denver2k]

Whoooshhh!

Old news though: Last updated - Thursday, 10 May 2007, 07:40 GMT 08:40 UK

I knew some religious types who allowed their daughter to have it at age 13, on the basis that she might "fall away" in future. But they're the type who think that religious belief is something you work out for youself. Parents can guide, but ultimately, it has to be the kids choice or it ain't worf nuffink.

Strangely weird.....What religion these "religious people" follow?