Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Did such a public service myself some years ago. Fortunately before I became a contractor so it was a tec-book reading holiday with extra sleeping.
It was a murder case of some length and complexity but what was most perplexing was the utter stupidity of the other 11 sods roped in for civic duty.
I can only assume that our jails are overcrowded due to non-jury trials as this lot couldn't decide which side to chew their food on without breaking into a sweat.
It was a murder case of some length and complexity but what was most perplexing was the utter stupidity of the other 11 sods roped in for civic duty.
That's what shocked me too, Two Wolves, although maybe it shouldn't. On my first day I was sent down to a courtroom as one of a group of 15 jurors from which they select 12 at random (for those who've not done this before, the extra 3 are just in case anyone objects to any of the jurors). Anyways, I was not one of the 12 selected to sit on the case, but the surplus 3 stay in the courtroom while the other 12 are sworn in. Two of them, a man in his late 20s and a woman in her early 50s could not read and so had to repeat the oath word for word after one of the ushers.
Didn't they know that if you're an atheist etc. you can affirm rather than take the oath?
Talk about Medieval...
Indeed, but it still requires you to be able to read the words off a card. Are you sure you weren't one of the two zeity, or are you giant alien lizards having an off day?
As you might have guessed, I've been sent home for the afternoon again as the wheels of British justice clearly don't need to crank them right now. Have to phone them at 15:30 to see if they want me to attend tomorrow.
Hmmmm....it's all going a little too well. I hope they aren't going to spring a nasty surprise. Sitting around for two weeks, then at 16:59 on a Friday, big case suddenly roles in.
And no, LB, neither of the indequates was me... They were both my cousin Fred.
I think I understand how it goes with you guys - you share three of the same mothers, yes?
So far, so good indeed. I got a bit edgy this morning because they had two "high profile" cases starting. No idea what they were but when this happens they summon double the number of jurors (30) as it's considered more likely there will be objections from the briefs or the defendant(s), plus, of course, more likely one or more of the potential jurors will be unduly conversant with the facts of the case, influenced by irresponsible reporting prior to the case being heard, etc. I suppose, in those sort of cases, jurors who can't read might be more sought after!
"but my father got a really intersting case of a farmworker accused of buggering his pigs"
So now you know why your bacon tastes salty!
Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
Comment