• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Question Time Last Night

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    Honesty in Politics now there is an Oxy-Moron (as opposed to a CyberMoron)

    The sinking of the Belgrano in May 1982 remains one of the most controversial aspects of the Falklands conflict: more than 300 members of the crew died when the submarine Conqueror torpedoed it.

    Margaret Thatcher, then Prime Minister, defended the decision to sink the vessel and dismissed claims that it was outside and heading away from a 200-mile exclusion zone which had been imposed around the Falklands by the British.

    There was a war on and they started it. Get over it !! I didn't see the Argies complaining to their junta about the attempted sinking of our ships with exocets and the burning of our brave troops. You are a typically politically correct buffoon, Sourpuss.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
      Honesty in Politics now there is an Oxy-Moron (as opposed to a CyberMoron)

      The sinking of the Belgrano in May 1982 remains one of the most controversial aspects of the Falklands conflict: more than 300 members of the crew died when the submarine Conqueror torpedoed it.

      Margaret Thatcher, then Prime Minister, defended the decision to sink the vessel and dismissed claims that it was outside and heading away from a 200-mile exclusion zone which had been imposed around the Falklands by the British.
      I agree about the oxy-moron

      However the "Rules of Engagement" never said "We won't shoot them if they don't come within 200 miles"......

      They were killing "Our Guys". The Belgrano had the potential to attack us.
      "We" stopped it!

      I am not "sure" we were/are particularly justified in claiming the Falklands as "ours" or that we should have spent millions sending a Task Force or even that "war" is justified - but given that those decisions had been made "shooting" the Belgrano was "right"

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Drewster View Post
        I agree about the oxy-moron


        I am not "sure" we were/are particularly justified in claiming the Falklands as "ours" or that we should have spent millions sending a Task Force or even that "war" is justified - but given that those decisions had been made "shooting" the Belgrano was "right"


        The fact of whether the Falklands was ours or not was immaterial. The citizens on the Falklands were British and deserved our support. If you let a country just march in and take your territory, don't be surprised when another country takes liberties, such as Spain over Gibraltar.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Drewster View Post
          I agree about the oxy-moron

          I don't agree, because not all politicians are 'feathering their nests'. There are politicians with principles such as Robin Cook, Tony Benn, Michael Heseltine, Margaret Thatcher, William Hague, Ken Clarke etc.

          Unfortunately for the current HMG, most of the principled variety tend to be on the Tory side. Blair, Brown, Mandelson, Blunkett, Jowell, Harman, Straw, and Jackie Smith to name just a few, have all been caught out for being somewhat less than honest. Then of course we had Robert Maxwell, a couple of decades ago !!

          The Tories have had a few, but nothing like Labour, with names such as Archer and Parkinson springing to mind.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
            I don't have a mind.
            Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
            I takes liberties
            If you quote me please try not to misrepresent me quite so blatently!

            I think we were (originally) in semi-agreement

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
              The Tories have had a few, but nothing like Labour, with names such as Archer and Parkinson springing to mind.
              And...

              Graham Riddick
              David Tredinnick
              Neil Hamilton
              Jonathan Aitken
              Derick Conway
              David Mellor

              ...not trying to say the Tory's are any worse than labour for these sort of Shenanigans, but you do seem to look at things with Blue tinted spectacles!
              Last edited by TheBigD; 20 February 2009, 14:04.
              If at first you don't succeed... skydiving is not for you!

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by TheBigD View Post
                And...

                Graham Riddick
                David Tredinnick
                Neil Hamilton
                Jonathan Aitken
                Derick Conway

                ...not trying to say the Tory's are any worse than labour for these sort of Shenanigans, but you do seem to look at things with Blue tinted spectacles!

                I could reel off a lot more from HMG, and don't forget the recent Lords debacle of cash for changes to the Law.
                Some of the scum have even returned to cabinet, such as Mandelson and Blunkett. The Labour front bench really are a lowly bunch, and if it starts there, you can quite safely bet that duplicity runs throughout their ranks.

                Why are they so against public scrutiny of expenses I wonder!!

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
                  I could reel off a lot more from HMG, and don't forget the recent Lords debacle of cash for changes to the Law.
                  Some of the scum have even returned to cabinet, such as Mandelson and Blunkett. The Labour front bench really are a lowly bunch, and if it starts there, you can quite safely bet that duplicity runs throughout their ranks.

                  Why are they so against public scrutiny of expenses I wonder!!
                  Add to that Hain and his dodgy donations and Smith with her 2nd home expenses being spent on her 1st home bills. The difference between a lot of the Tory sleaze merchants and this lot are that in a number of cases the Tory ones were relatively unknown back benchers rather than cabinet ministers and when found out they had a tendancy to step down.
                  Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.

                  I preferred version 1!

                  Comment


                    #19
                    I don't know, wasn't married Major shagging married Currie while Prime minister, and telling us all we should get back to moralistic family basics?

                    If you believe there is much honesty on either side, you are as daft as cyber Tory looks.
                    The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

                    But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
                      I don't know, wasn't married Major shagging married Currie while Prime minister, and telling us all we should get back to moralistic family basics?
                      How is that feathering his own nest?

                      Anyway, he deserved a peerage for that.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X