Originally posted by Mich the Tester
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
What makes a successful project?
Collapse
X
-
I'd sooner not. It sounds like a shambles. 3 testers for 5 projects? FFS.I'm better than dirt. Well, most kinds of dirt, not that fancy store-bought dirt... I can't compete with that stuff. -
Two testers, neither of which is a trained tester. I’m the one with the qualifications but I’m not allowed to test because I don’t have user rights.Originally posted by Rookie View PostI'd sooner not. It sounds like a shambles. 3 testers for 5 projects? FFS.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by Signo_cypher View PostSo much for my list, this is like herding cats!
That's Project Management in a nutshell.
As others have already said the key to a successful project is obtaining, understanding and satisfying the clients requirements. That's mainly a matter of stakeholder management.Comment
-
It's all about management of expectations. Disappoint early and often then they won't be so shocked at the end.Comment
-
In my experience, one of the most important things is to ensure that proper analysis is done initially to define the scope, and this should be signed off.
Then you make sure that you have a person with sufficient authority external to IT to ensure that users agree at every stage during the project and sign off at the various phases as they complete. This person is also responsible for ensuring that all designated users are dedicated to the project and available as required for testing, meetings etc.
On the IT side you must ensure that people have the necessary skills and training where required.
I have never worked on a failed project, funnily enough.
Comment
-
Someone ought to mention that to the managmentOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostTwo testers, neither of which is a trained tester. I’m the one with the qualifications but I’m not allowed to test because I don’t have user rights.
If at first you don't succeed... skydiving is not for you!Comment
-
Originally posted by Pondlife View PostIt's all about management of expectations. Disappoint early and often then they won't be so shocked at the end.
You're on fire today !Comment
-
Don't just take the client's request, but define the targets yourself. Then define the measurement of the targets. Then measure your performance against your targets by your metrics, and announce that targets have been met so the project is a success.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostTry the NuLabour methodology Stop aiming to build something to some predefined level of utility or quality and just aim to spend a shedload of money. Guaranteed success and BOOMED for contractors.
Not invented by New Labour, already well-developed by Accenture.Comment
-
Go on! Be a Tiger!Originally posted by expat View PostDon't just take the client's request, but define the targets yourself. Then define the measurement of the targets. Then measure your performance against your targets by your metrics, and announce that targets have been met so the project is a success.
Not invented by New Labour, already well-developed by Accenture.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
aka "ready, fire, aim"Originally posted by expat View PostDon't just take the client's request, but define the targets yourself. Then define the measurement of the targets. Then measure your performance against your targets by your metrics, and announce that targets have been met so the project is a success.
Not invented by New Labour, already well-developed by Accenture.
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - EpicurusComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment