• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

What makes a successful project?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Unlimited budget and realistic lead times.
    I'm better than dirt. Well, most kinds of dirt, not that fancy store-bought dirt... I can't compete with that stuff.

    Comment


      #12
      It entirely depends on how you define successful. If what's been delivered is a broken mess but has paid me high rates and given me multiple extensions has the gig been a failure for my business?
      ǝןqqıʍ

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
        It entirely depends on how you define successful. If what's been delivered is a broken mess but has paid me high rates and given me multiple extensions has the gig been a failure for my business?
        Very good point.
        I'm better than dirt. Well, most kinds of dirt, not that fancy store-bought dirt... I can't compete with that stuff.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
          It entirely depends on how you define successful. If what's been delivered is a broken mess
          You mean there's another way to deliver software???

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by deckster View Post
            You mean there's another way to deliver software???
            Apparently so. I'm told all you need is a scrum master, a chicken and a pig.
            ǝןqqıʍ

            Comment


              #16
              Try the NuLabour methodology Stop aiming to build something to some predefined level of utility or quality and just aim to spend a shedload of money. Guaranteed success and BOOMED for contractors.
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                #17
                A successful project is nailing what the customer actually wants, and then giving it to them at the agreed time at the agreed cost.

                Getting the first of those right is the real trick.
                Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by PM-Junkie View Post
                  A successful project is nailing what the customer actually wants, and then giving it to them at the agreed time at the agreed cost.

                  Getting the first of those right is the real trick.
                  True. The first one is very difficult though as most of the time the customer doesn't actually know what they want or their requiremnts/scope change over time.

                  It's the old quality/time/cost malarky.
                  I'm better than dirt. Well, most kinds of dirt, not that fancy store-bought dirt... I can't compete with that stuff.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
                    Apparently so. I'm told all you need is a scrum master, a chicken and a pig.
                    So much for my list, this is like herding cats!

                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxwTC13f1PE

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Rookie View Post
                      True. The first one is very difficult though as most of the time the customer doesn't actually know what they want or their requiremnts/scope change over time.

                      It's the old quality/time/cost malarky.
                      Now imagine trying to run 5 test projects at the same time using one test environment and two amateur testers, who can’t take over each other’s work, when the customer can’t even tell you which projects have which priority.
                      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X