• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Heathrow Third Runway? Option?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Are you comparing like for like? The floats on existing seaplanes are based on 60 or 70 year old designs. Quite possibly new designs would be much more efficient. They could also be made to retract if the plane's fuselage is designed to fit them.

    Please, let's have a bit more can-do around here. We're techies, not feeble minded managers. The likes of us built the modern world. Managers gave us the pet rock and merchant banking. We're standing on the shoulders of giants like Isambard Kingdom Brunel, Alan Turing and Barnes Wallis. Let's do them justice and stop trying to pretend things are 'too difficult'.
    Absolutely: there was no thought for streamlining then. But floats could retract, or indeed be efficient without retracting (and possibly carry wheeled undercarriage inside).

    And FFS let's not only have some can-do, but some do-first-and-sell-to-the-world.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
      Trouble is, those planes will have to fly over Kensington & Chelsea - increasing actually annoyance by a factor of 10* for people who actually matter.

      * made up figure. Can't be arsed to look up the real one.
      I bet if the third runway was going to be in those areas it would sundenly become not viable!

      Hey we do not need green spaces anyway, lets start at dover and cement the whole of Uk over!
      Pleomax

      This is an unusual paragraph. I'm curious as to just how quickly you can find out what is so unusual about it. It looks so ordinary and plain that you would think nothing was wrong with it. In fact, nothing is wrong with it! It is highly unusual though. Study it and think about it, but you still may not find anything odd. But if you work at it a bit, you might find out. Try to do so without any coaching!

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
        Trouble is, those planes will have to fly over Kensington & Chelsea - increasing actually annoyance by a factor of 10* for people who actually matter.
        Good. The place is full of Merchant Wbankers and oligarchs, so they should empty the plane's bogs as they fly over.
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          #24
          What is wrong with a new airport in the Thames Estuary? They could build a new Thames Barrier while they are at it......

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
            What is wrong with a new airport in the Thames Estuary? They could build a new Thames Barrier while they are at it......
            Apart from many other good reasons not to build an airport in the Thames estuary, there are a lot of birds living there, and birds can cause a few problems.
            Cats are evil.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by swamp View Post
              Apart from many other good reasons not to build an airport in the Thames estuary, there are a lot of birds living there, and birds can cause a few problems.
              Especially when they get anywhere near your wallet.
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by swamp View Post
                Apart from many other good reasons not to build an airport in the Thames estuary, there are a lot of birds living there, and birds can cause a few problems.
                Another good reason to reintroduce seaplanes?

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by swamp View Post
                  Apart from many other good reasons not to build an airport in the Thames estuary, there are a lot of birds living there, and birds can cause a few problems.
                  Hmmm so flying to Hong Kong is not a good idea then...
                  This default font is sooooooooooooo boring and so are short usernames

                  Comment


                    #29
                    As shown, the proposed airport is in the arse end of nowhere.

                    They are proposing building a couple of tunnels, each looks around the size of the Channel Tunnel!
                    Cats are evil.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by swamp View Post
                      As shown, the proposed airport is in the arse end of nowhere.

                      They are proposing building a couple of tunnels, each looks around the size of the Channel Tunnel!
                      ...and some people think sea planes are inefficient!
                      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X