• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Do as I say, not as I do

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Do as I say, not as I do

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/f...n-by-2010.html

    At the Budget in March, Mr Darling forecast that borrowing would peak this year at £43 billion, equal to 2.7 per cent of the entire economy. That was the biggest annual borrowing figure since Labour came to power in 1997, and led to warnings about the impact on the UK's future economic performance.

    But that £43 billion is dwarfed by the £78 billion that Mr Darling said he will borrow this year. Next financial year's borrowing will be even more staggering at £118 billion, the equivalent of 8 per cent of national income.

    Despite the size of the borrowing, Treasury officials insisted that only around half of that borrowing is to fund current expenditure
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/7810315.stm

    The chancellor's department has rejected a request from the Scottish government to spread the cost of the £2bn bridge over 20 years
    Or in other words, Gordon's allowed to borrow the money to try and buy off the election, but won't allow the SNP to do it to actually fund a long term project.

    "I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith

    On them! On them! They fail!

    #2
    Originally posted by Incognito View Post
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/f...n-by-2010.html



    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/7810315.stm



    Or in other words, Gordon's allowed to borrow the money to try and buy off the election, but won't allow the SNP to do it to actually fund a long term project.

    You don't think public money's supposed to be spent on useful and interesting stuff like bridges do you?
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Incognito View Post
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/f...n-by-2010.html



      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/7810315.stm



      Or in other words, Gordon's allowed to borrow the money to try and buy off the election, but won't allow the SNP to do it to actually fund a long term project.

      this seems to rest on the assumption that someone will lend the broke UK this vast amount of money.

      I would not bet on that assumption holding up.


      DOOMED!!!
      "Condoms should come with a free pack of earplugs."

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
        You don't think public money's supposed to be spent on useful and interesting stuff like bridges do you?
        Particularly in Scotland...
        Older and ...well, just older!!

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
          You don't think public money's supposed to be spent on useful and interesting stuff like bridges do you?
          Which is a pity. If government is going to spend its way out of recession/depression then would be nice to get something in return.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
            Which is a pity. If government is going to spend its way out of recession/depression then would be nice to get something in return.
            Indeed, unlike some of the government's more stupid and wasteful projects, which offer zero gain, a bridge would be some use.

            Comment


              #7
              As Darling said these things get done by PFI now and the SNP don't want to do that. It's the SNPs fault that they can't get their 'Futures Trust' going which they proclaimed was the better alternative to to PFI.

              The quicker the SNP get shown the door the better, they really are a fuggin joke.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
                Indeed, unlike some of the government's more stupid and wasteful projects, which offer zero gain, a bridge would be some use.
                For Gordon to jump off.

                Comment


                  #9
                  I'd swop you some bridges for an ID card scheme
                  (\__/)
                  (>'.'<)
                  ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
                    I'd swop you some bridges for an ID card scheme
                    You could probably buy and launch 5 new Hubbles for the price of that ID card scheme and the NHS system.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X