• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Do as I say, not as I do"

Collapse

  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    5

    we could have a MacHubble to look for Alex Salmonds economic nouse
    A LeekHubble to look for the Welsh celestial choir and a few English ones to look for Gordon Browns brain



    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    I'd swop you some bridges for an ID card scheme
    You could probably buy and launch 5 new Hubbles for the price of that ID card scheme and the NHS system.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    I'd swop you some bridges for an ID card scheme

    Leave a comment:


  • KentPhilip
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    Indeed, unlike some of the government's more stupid and wasteful projects, which offer zero gain, a bridge would be some use.
    For Gordon to jump off.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    As Darling said these things get done by PFI now and the SNP don't want to do that. It's the SNPs fault that they can't get their 'Futures Trust' going which they proclaimed was the better alternative to to PFI.

    The quicker the SNP get shown the door the better, they really are a fuggin joke.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Which is a pity. If government is going to spend its way out of recession/depression then would be nice to get something in return.
    Indeed, unlike some of the government's more stupid and wasteful projects, which offer zero gain, a bridge would be some use.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    You don't think public money's supposed to be spent on useful and interesting stuff like bridges do you?
    Which is a pity. If government is going to spend its way out of recession/depression then would be nice to get something in return.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    You don't think public money's supposed to be spent on useful and interesting stuff like bridges do you?
    Particularly in Scotland...

    Leave a comment:


  • ThomasSoerensen
    replied
    Originally posted by Incognito View Post
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/f...n-by-2010.html



    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/7810315.stm



    Or in other words, Gordon's allowed to borrow the money to try and buy off the election, but won't allow the SNP to do it to actually fund a long term project.

    this seems to rest on the assumption that someone will lend the broke UK this vast amount of money.

    I would not bet on that assumption holding up.


    DOOMED!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by Incognito View Post
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/f...n-by-2010.html



    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/7810315.stm



    Or in other words, Gordon's allowed to borrow the money to try and buy off the election, but won't allow the SNP to do it to actually fund a long term project.

    You don't think public money's supposed to be spent on useful and interesting stuff like bridges do you?

    Leave a comment:


  • Incognito
    started a topic Do as I say, not as I do

    Do as I say, not as I do

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/f...n-by-2010.html

    At the Budget in March, Mr Darling forecast that borrowing would peak this year at £43 billion, equal to 2.7 per cent of the entire economy. That was the biggest annual borrowing figure since Labour came to power in 1997, and led to warnings about the impact on the UK's future economic performance.

    But that £43 billion is dwarfed by the £78 billion that Mr Darling said he will borrow this year. Next financial year's borrowing will be even more staggering at £118 billion, the equivalent of 8 per cent of national income.

    Despite the size of the borrowing, Treasury officials insisted that only around half of that borrowing is to fund current expenditure
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/7810315.stm

    The chancellor's department has rejected a request from the Scottish government to spread the cost of the £2bn bridge over 20 years
    Or in other words, Gordon's allowed to borrow the money to try and buy off the election, but won't allow the SNP to do it to actually fund a long term project.

Working...
X