I don't mind paying if I do watch what I have to pay for (the point is currently moot since I do have a TV licence at home). But I would strongly object to having to pay a TV licence for having a PC that I can connect to the internet, just because the BBC decide to put stuff there thet I could access.
Just as, for example, when I lived in France: they decided that CD Roms were mostly for recording copyrighted music, so they put a 1€ levy on each blank CD Rom, to be paid to the music industry. I started buying them elsewhere, out of principle (the principle being that that wasn't what I used them for, and I had no wish to pay Johnny Hallyday one euro every rime I backed up my holiday snaps).
I believe that in Germany you do need a licence for a PC that can connect to the internet, if you don't already have a TV licence. I believe that the German government at first seriously considered requiring a licence for all PCs anyway, and that by location and ownership: so a contractor would need one licence for his registered office (the TV licence for that place as a home would not cover it ), one for any client office, and one for the hotel in the evening.
Just as, for example, when I lived in France: they decided that CD Roms were mostly for recording copyrighted music, so they put a 1€ levy on each blank CD Rom, to be paid to the music industry. I started buying them elsewhere, out of principle (the principle being that that wasn't what I used them for, and I had no wish to pay Johnny Hallyday one euro every rime I backed up my holiday snaps).
I believe that in Germany you do need a licence for a PC that can connect to the internet, if you don't already have a TV licence. I believe that the German government at first seriously considered requiring a licence for all PCs anyway, and that by location and ownership: so a contractor would need one licence for his registered office (the TV licence for that place as a home would not cover it ), one for any client office, and one for the hotel in the evening.
Comment