• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Tory MP arrested

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by tay View Post
    Bullies.
    Stiff upper lip now. Don't let them see you cry man. Those big bi-bullies.
    Bored.

    Comment


      #72
      Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
      Sky News says he was arrested under the Official Secrets Act.

      I thought the Criminal Justice Act introduced the charges of "conspiring to commit misconduct in a public office" and "aiding and abetting misconduct in public office", but I may be mistaken.
      Apologies, they were the charges being speculated, I didn't know they were under the Criminal Justice Act.

      I was listening to David Davies this morning saying the information wasn't classified under the Official Secrets Act - but in hindsight he's a politician so...

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by ace00 View Post
        Stiff upper lip now. Don't let them see you cry man. Those big bi-bullies.
        Thanks! Good point!

        Comment


          #74
          Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
          I was listening to David Davies this morning saying the information wasn't classified under the Official Secrets Act - but in hindsight he's a politician so...
          I don't remember seeing anything related to 'information the government of the day doesn't want to tell the public because it's politically embarassing' when I've signed the OSA.
          Older and ...well, just older!!

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
            I don't remember seeing anything related to 'information the government of the day doesn't want to tell the public because it's politically embarassing' when I've signed the OSA.
            They gave you the time to read it before you signed it? Where was that?

            Comment


              #76
              Originally posted by Purple Dalek View Post
              They gave you the time to read it before you signed it? Where was that?
              Can't tell you. I'd have to kill you but, as you're a dalek, I'll just pull out your batteries instead...
              Older and ...well, just older!!

              Comment


                #77
                Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
                I don't remember seeing anything related to 'information the government of the day doesn't want to tell the public because it's politically embarassing' when I've signed the OSA.
                You can't tell us that.
                ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

                Comment


                  #78
                  There's an interesting comment in the Guardian "have your say" on this:

                  .. So why did the Met arrest Green? Why not ask him to attend an interview at the police station to answer questions, like they do with many other suspects in criminal matters?

                  Simple. Unless someone has been arrested for an indictable offence - i.e. an offence that can be heard in the Crown Court - the police can't search their premises under s.18 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act.

                  It seems quite clear to me that someone, somewhere, was worried about what else Green might have that would embarrass them. The Cabinet Office needed to find a way to search his premises within the law, so they had to find a trumped-up charge that would fit the bill and get him arrested for it to seize any other "sensitive" documents he might be in possession of and put them out of harm's way.
                  That sounds the most plausible of the theories I've heard.
                  Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
                    There's an interesting comment in the Guardian "have your say" on this:



                    That sounds the most plausible of the theories I've heard.
                    I agree. The Anti-Terrorism Laws are, it has to be said, bloody fantastic!:

                    Legal hoops to jump through?
                    Bothersome MPs or anyone else, for that matter?
                    Fancy a shufty around someone's house without having just cause?

                    Anti-Terrorism Law to the rescue!

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
                      I don't remember seeing anything related to 'information the government of the day doesn't want to tell the public because it's politically embarassing' when I've signed the OSA.
                      Nor me, but that's exactly how it was used in the 80s fair takes me back it does.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X