Originally posted by DodgyAgent
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Tory MP arrested
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Such insight! Never voted tory in my life, never intend to.I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!
-
This really isn't a party political issue at all - the government of the day seems to like to throw it's weight around if civil servants are leaking stuff that's an embarrassment to them. Like all top brass they seem to prefer to have a witch hunt than stop doing crap things.
This was just as true in the 80s when they went after Clive Ponting and Sarah Tidsall as it is now - the slight detail difference being that Tam Dayell would have been arrested, but it's basically the same.Comment
-
Comment
-
That is exaclty the most important point. Let them have the "anti-terrorism" laws they want, and they will not limit themselves to using them to keep us all safe from Al Qaeda. They will use these laws to keep themselves safe, from us if need be.Originally posted by sunnysan View PostNick I think you are missing the point as to why this is so significant.
A leak of political "sensitive" information is by no means and act of terrorism, no more so then white collor fraud.
The problem here is the blanket use of terror laws and even more so the incorrect application of terror law, which appears to be for political gain.
The misuse of the judical system is a characteristic of immature, unstable political systems and dictatorships.
The man is not a terrorist so why have the terror laws been used to detain him?Comment
-
Neither of those. The information wasn't official secrets, and the Criminal Justice Act is irrelevant.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostThe Official Secrets Act?
Criminal Justice Act?Comment
-
Maybe, plus the following provisions under the Official Secrets Act: Blabbing, grassing, snitching, spilling the beans, informing and squealing.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostThe Official Secrets Act?
Criminal Justice Act?Comment
-
I don't think anyone has mentioned the name of the beast so far, but can it be coincidence that someone famous for sleaze, dishonesty, and shafting up the back, is back in government....?Comment
-
A good point, well made.Originally posted by expat View PostI don't think anyone has mentioned the name of the beast so far, but can it be coincidence that someone famous for sleaze, dishonesty, and shafting up the back, is back in government....?Comment
-
Sky News says he was arrested under the Official Secrets Act.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostNeither of those. The information wasn't official secrets, and the Criminal Justice Act is irrelevant.
I thought the Criminal Justice Act introduced the charges of "conspiring to commit misconduct in a public office" and "aiding and abetting misconduct in public office", but I may be mistaken.Comment
-
Luckily you dont get a vote! But it does show why you and your buddies strut around here like you run the place. Bullies.Originally posted by Xenophon View Post
If you must know, I do think it is surprising that you haven't been banned, but hey ho.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Yesterday 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Yesterday 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Jan 16 07:03
- New UK crypto rules now apply. Here’s how mandatory reporting affects contractors Jan 15 07:03
- What the Ray McCann Loan Charge Review means for contractors Jan 14 06:21
- IT contractor demand defied seasonal slump in December 2025 Jan 13 07:10
- Five tax return hacks for contractors as Jan 31st looms Jan 12 07:45


Comment