• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Government spin AGAIN

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    How can "what is the name of our galaxy?" be regarded as a science exam question?

    If you don't know that by whatever age you take GCSEs (14/15?) you should be sent straight to the mines.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
      Ok that's scary, it's a long time since I learned the basic equations and I'm ashamed to say that I had to think hard to recall some of them, but that paper is a complete farce.
      At a guess (i.e. without checking some of the numbers with a calculator) I scored 90%+ in 15-20 mins reading through that paper.
      I am still stunned at Q2b: 1 mark for being able to write down one formula, or equation as they put it, from Ohm's Law:

      V=IR

      and 2 marks for being able to calculate

      0.5 x 30 = 15.

      Or perhaps it is for knowing what to do if you have V=IR and know that I=0.5 and R=30.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by expat View Post
        "The only way to deal with bureaucrats is with stealth and sudden violence" - Boutros Boutros-Ghali.
        Dit Bot Bot really say that? He always seemed a mild-mannered kind of guy (and was a bureaucrat himself wasn't he?)

        Maybe I'm missing some irony there, as he was in the public eye around the time of Gulf War 1.
        Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by expat View Post
          A department for children, schools and families spokesperson said that standards in science were in fact improving in response to better funding of schools
          Perhaps they mean that the teachers are better behaved than they were in science. I suppose they don't throw things at the dimmer pupils anymore.

          Pity.
          When money ceases to be the tool by which men deal with one another, then men become the tools of men. Blood, whips and guns--or dollars. Take your choice - Ayn Rand, Atlas.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
            Did Bot Bot really say that? He always seemed a mild-mannered kind of guy (and was a bureaucrat himself wasn't he?)
            That's why I found it remarkable that he said that.

            Comment


              #16
              The most shocking thing is the pass scores for the grades.

              According to the article 20% was good enough for a C in some exams. IIRC 50-60% was a C in the mid/late 80s. 20% would have been a grade 5 CSE or ungraded.

              So you have a situation where you have a 40 yr old with a C in a Science that possibily got 3 times more correct questions then an school leaver with the same grade.
              The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

              But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
                The most shocking thing is the pass scores for the grades.

                According to the article 20% was good enough for a C in some exams. IIRC 50-60% was a C in the mid/late 80s. 20% would have been a grade 5 CSE or ungraded.

                So you have a situation where you have a 40 yr old with a C in a Science that possibily got 3 times more correct questions then an school leaver with the same grade.
                Which is why young people have more qualifications than older people.

                Which is why asking for unnecessary qualifications is age discrimination by the back door.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
                  So you have a situation where you have a 40 yr old with a C in a Science that possibily got 3 times more correct questions then an school leaver with the same grade.
                  It’s not only the sciences that face this problem. I recently had to explain to some jerk with an business degree how to calculate depreciation on an asset.

                  But then, I got an A for GCSE economics twenty years ago; he got his MBA two years ago.
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
                    The most shocking thing is the pass scores for the grades.

                    According to the article 20% was good enough for a C in some exams. IIRC 50-60% was a C in the mid/late 80s. 20% would have been a grade 5 CSE or ungraded.

                    So you have a situation where you have a 40 yr old with a C in a Science that possibily got 3 times more correct questions then an school leaver with the same grade.
                    Could that be explained by the paper grading?

                    I know some subjects (esp maths & probably science) once had papers where it was possible to only get u-d, e-c or d-a. In those cases, I think it's possible to take the harder paper, get 20% and be awarded a "C".

                    I don't know if that still happens.
                    ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by expat View Post
                      Which is why young people have more qualifications than older people.

                      Which is why asking for unnecessary qualifications is age discrimination by the back door.
                      Why not use the crappy educational system to your advantage? Getting an MBA or MSc (distance learning or part time) for anyone educated in science, maths or engineering in the 80s or previously is a piece of cake.

                      This is a particularly good option when you are travelling on contracts. Gives you somefink to do in the evenings, innit?
                      Last edited by sasguru; 27 November 2008, 13:35.
                      Hard Brexit now!
                      #prayfornodeal

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X