• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Government spin AGAIN"

Collapse

  • dinker
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Yes it has. 40 years ago science was respected and most people understood it was responsible for national wealth.
    Now people are too stupid to make the connection.
    national wealth is created by borrowing money, innit?

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Pretty much everything has mass when it changes direction, even massless things.
    There is an object in the universe that can change direction so quickly that it can be proven to have no mass, yet the inertia is so great that it must have infinite mass.
    It's called my project manager



    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    oh its one of those principles, thingies, you were talking about. like once you know them you can deduce the world.
    IIRC there was a problem in amplifiers and the cause was that the electrons moved through the vacuum, hit the cathode but then bounced off before being reattracted. This proved that these things had mass. i.e. its a physical bounce rather than a magnetic type one.

    interesting if you do a degree in ancient electronics, otherwise, useless, totally useless.



    There was a small dimple in my understanding of our World that has now been filled. Thank you.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    oh its one of those principles, thingies, you were talking about. like once you know them you can deduce the world.
    IIRC there was a problem in amplifiers and the cause was that the electrons moved through the vacuum, hit the cathode but then bounced off before being reattracted. This proved that these things had mass. i.e. its a physical bounce rather than a magnetic type one.

    interesting if you do a degree in ancient electronics, otherwise, useless, totally useless.



    Pretty much everything has mass when it changes direction, even massless things.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Go on then, enlighten us...
    oh its one of those principles, thingies, you were talking about. like once you know them you can deduce the world.
    IIRC there was a problem in amplifiers and the cause was that the electrons moved through the vacuum, hit the cathode but then bounced off before being reattracted. This proved that these things had mass. i.e. its a physical bounce rather than a magnetic type one.

    interesting if you do a degree in ancient electronics, otherwise, useless, totally useless.



    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    I checked, my eldest did in fact get issued with an equations sheet with the exam papers, he thinks it's barking mad too.

    I have to admit that I despair at the state of science, mathematics and engineering education in this country.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by Platypus View Post
    You might be surprised: allocation of marks in dependent on particular key words being used, e.g. for 8c if you don't use the word they're looking for you don't get the mark, even if you exhibit a deep understanding of the workings of the universe.
    Excuse me, there's only Hubble redshift, background radiation, and light elements. 8b does redshift so 8c must be the background. Whether or not you say cosmic or microwave, you definitely have it there.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    At a guess (i.e. without checking some of the numbers with a calculator) I scored 90%+ in 15-20 mins reading through that paper.
    You might be surprised: allocation of marks in dependent on particular key words being used, e.g. for 8c if you don't use the word they're looking for you don't get the mark, even if you exhibit a deep understanding of the workings of the universe.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    do you want to know what cathode 'bounce' is

    *smug b@stard warning*



    Isn't it why you use a tetrode (or pentode)?

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    And now you're making a fortune making & selling valve amplifiers to the audio nuts?
    do you want to know what cathode 'bounce' is

    *smug b@stard warning*



    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    And now you're making a fortune making & selling valve amplifiers to the audio nuts?
    I have wondered about that. I can't afford one of these, but maybe I could still build one. Still have soldering iron, and roll of 5-core self-fluxing solder that I bought in 1975 (not realinsing then that it would be a lifetime's supply).

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by expat View Post
    The point is, a whistle is not actually simpler than radar, just more common.
    I've just had a flashback - we used the term whistling to describe carrier frequencies working. That must be thanks to Raby, eh?

    Sorry, carry on.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by Purple Dalek View Post
    Tch, yanks don't even know how a whistle works.
    The point is, a whistle is not actually simpler than radar, just more common.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    What's with the negative vibes? You're supposed to be an eternal optimist.
    you should have seen where I started from




    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    useless.
    useless.

    and I'll tell you something else. I was fixing a fault using my voltmete and a big manual with circuit diagrams and stuff, and these yanks were working on another piece of kit. They had a big box that looked like a gramaphone, they called it a computer.
    'If you want , we will get you trained up to be our Brit liason on the computer stuff'
    'no thanks, it's tulipe, it will never catch on'

    useless, thats me.



    What's with the negative vibes? You're supposed to be an eternal optimist.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X