More Evidence of Lying Corrupt Thieving Violent Police

[Paddy]

First of all, I heard the news on Radio 4 and I searched for the follow up. In the light of the repeated lies of the Police involved in the Menezes shooting being defended by head of the Met (Blair); I was discussed to hear the Chief Constable of Hampshire trivialise the offences made by members of his force. How can courts believe police evidence when they give evidence?

If you or I were to have such a criminal record we would not get security clearance not would we be allowed to work in banks.

Many forum members go on about how we should punish benefit fraud but when the police do it, then it id disregarded.

[Purple Dalek]

First of all, I heard the news on Radio 4 and I searched for the follow up. In the light of the repeated lies of the Police involved in the Menezes shooting being defended by head of the Met (Blair); I was discussed to hear the Chief Constable of Hampshire trivialise the offences made by members of his force. How can courts believe police evidence when they give evidence?

If you or I were to have such a criminal record we would not get security clearance not would we be allowed to work in banks.

Many forum members go on about how we should punish benefit fraud but when the police do it, then it id disregarded.

That's how this all came into the open, believe it or not. A civilian member of the police force was fired after a really quite trivial offence, whereas a serving police officer was allowed to continue after something far more serious.