• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Baby P

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    My view is that it is the state that creates most of the evil people and most certainly the criminal and anti social elements of society.
    Victorian England, no Welfare, but copious amounts of violent crime and debauchery. Then take the most notorious serial killers of recent times, none on state benefits that I can recall, either working or middle class.
    The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

    But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
      Look at evidence then. What do you think a survey of criminals would throw up? would they be mostly privatly educated middle classes at the one end or would they be the products of single parent, council house, welfare recipients?

      what do you think?
      If we have 100k of these criminals/potential criminals now, how many would there be if there were no free houses for young single mums and much less welfare. more ? or less ?


      what do you think ?



      (\__/)
      (>'.'<)
      ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
        Victorian England, no Welfare, but copious amounts of violent crime and debauchery. Then take the most notorious serial killers of recent times, none on state benefits that I can recall, either working or middle class.
        And serial killers account for what percentage of crime? Is it 0.00045 or 0.000045%, I can never remember.
        “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
          Look at evidence then. What do you think a survey of criminals would throw up? would they be mostly privatly educated middle classes at the one end or would they be the products of single parent, council house, welfare recipients?

          what do you think?
          It depends on the nature of the crime doesn't it?

          A lot of new crimes have been created in the last ten years under the banners of anti-social behaviour & terrorism which criminalises behaviour which would have previously been accepted.
          ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
            And serial killers account for what percentage of crime? Is it 0.00045 or 0.000045%, I can never remember.
            He was talking about evil people, fiddling the dole and a bit of shoplifting or joyriding is not evil in my book.
            The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

            But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
              What is the point of protecting a child that is DEAD !!! This is to protect HMG, and it's just a shame that too many people are just too stupid to realise this.
              Oh get a grip.

              Slowly:
              Secrecy is in general automatic in family law and child protection. This general principle applies from the start, in order to ensure that children's identity etc are not divulged, for their protection.

              It is a general rule, not an ad hoc action in one case.

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
                He was talking about evil people, fiddling the dole and a bit of shoplifting or joyriding is not evil in my book.
                Then you need a new book baggy. It is a slippery slope I tell you....today's litter lout is tomorrow's crazed gunman!!
                “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

                Comment


                  #68
                  Originally posted by expat View Post
                  Oh get a grip.

                  Slowly:
                  Secrecy is in general automatic in family law and child protection. This general principle applies from the start, in order to ensure that children's identity etc are not divulged, for their protection.

                  It is a general rule, not an ad hoc action in one case.


                  It is NOT a general rule. The authorities specifically went to court to shut this woman up. The child is DEAD and all evidence should now be gathered to weed out any incompetent people and sack them. Of course HMG do not want this because they have much to hide.

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
                    If we have 100k of these criminals/potential criminals now, how many would there be if there were no free houses for young single mums and much less welfare. more ? or less ?


                    what do you think ?



                    So why do we pay tax for welfare when it makes not the slightest diffence to poverty and crime?
                    Last edited by DodgyAgent; 17 November 2008, 14:58.
                    Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
                      It is NOT a general rule. Yes it is. The authorities specifically went to court to shut this woman up. Yes. The child is DEAD Yes and all evidence should now be gathered to weed out any incompetent people and sack them. Yes. Or more. Of course HMG do not want this because they have much to hide. Yes.
                      IOW WIS

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X